Here you go Florian... my reasons for a digital display. Simply because I don't manufacture devices - I use them, so I don't know if a simple 8digit display is more expenisve than a analog display. I own a mulitmeter but it doesn't handle minijacks and it is very fuzzy to measure thing with it. You have to patch and unpatch and then fiddle around to find the tip to measure against. Also I feel a bit like Bakis does(mostly). If it can be made by Doepfer and is useful I rather have a Doepfer module that a mix of stuff that doesn't fit into the rack. It is more useful, looks better and it's Doepfer =) I prefer digital displays cause then 0,52 is 0,52 and not somewhere between to lines. But that is a personal taste that some may share and others not. Anyway a module with analog or digital display beat any standard multimeter to my needs. It it will be much cheaper or not remains to be seen. Doepfer hasn't given us a ballpark figure yet. I will wait for that before I judge. Further more if it was purely about economics I would sell all my analog gear and buy a cheap second hand novation or waldorf VA-synth. Sometimes we just like things to be modules, don't we? =) Sincerely /Andreas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Florian Anwander" <Florian.Anwander@consol.de> To: <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 7:03 PM Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] attenuators and vu-meters > Andreas > > one question: why do you ask for a quite expensive digital VU-Meter module, > when each electronic store sells a multi-meter much(!!) cheaper? And btw, > the multi meter is a very basic tool that should be owned by electronic > musician. > > Florian > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] attenuators and vu-meters
2003-05-06 by Andreas Lindholm
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.