hi all and Doepfer, I think I agree 90%, I just want a true TKB, an expressive controller. I just really don't care about midi, I don't use midi, and it seems it could be expensive to add good enough converters to make midi functions accurate. perhaps not: for $30 more sure midi is a cool bonus. But with this argument you could add midi to many A-100 modules, so I prefer leaving midi out of it. Keep it simple. (or keep it open?) I would want it to more and faster, but I want about all the new modules about to come out so my budget needs to catch up. Perhaps a very basic budget version would be good to get things going and later after feedback based on that a deluxe model or an expander like the A-154). Many have not used a TKB, so what people are asking for I suspect, may change drastically after having even a basic version. many exciting modules coming out, now we need a 9 or 12 space frame/psu. best, phil On 11/7/03 4:08 PM, "ringmod45" <ringmod45@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Hi Bakis and Mr Doepfer, > > The proposed TKB is bound for failure, feature and function wise, > idealistically speaking. Not every feature, one wants, will be able > to be implemented. > > Let's get the basics straight. First, the proposed Doepfer TKB is > modelled after the two of the most sought after and expressive > analogue controllers out there, the Buchla 219 Touch Keyboard and the > Serge TKB. Here are the url's; > > http://www.buchla.com/historical/b200/219-keyboard.html > > http://www.scampers.com/EGRES/wiz_seq.htm > > These are features and functions the proposed Doepfer TKB is based > upon. This the foundation from which to build upon and not to > subtract from. Mr. Doepfer and Company have done a Good Job so far, > it just needs to be tweaked some more. > > The pressure voltage, derived by capacitance-activated touch plates > or keys, is the most natural and expressive control in electrical > terms. It is very similar to playing a string instrument. It is > direct and immediate, finger to touch plate, unlike an organ manual, > finger to plastic key, plastic key to trigger contact. > > The whole point of the proposed Doepfer TKB is bring elements of the > above mentioned controllers and not to have a organ style manual > dictate how it should be or perform. There are very few of these > controllers around for people to make remarks or opine ideas on how > they should be built, so it should be modelled from the originals > with input from people who have used and understand them. > > The electronics of the Buchla 219 were then adapted to an organ style > manual. Here is the url, > > http://www.buchla.com/historical/b200/keys-23X.html > http://www.buchla.com/historical/b200/images/237-large.jpeg > > Since we live in the microprocessor age, it is only feasible and > logical to have midi onboard. Building the proposed Doepfer TKB, > Analogue style, would be cost prohibitive. It should be modular in > its approach to allow for expansion of I/O and sequencer functions > and not the other way around. > > To hear a touch keyboard in action, please check some of Charles > Cohen's mp3's to give you an idea. Here is the url, > > http://phobos.serve.com/charles_cohen/?D=A > > Live_at_the_Gathering_19981212 - - track 2 and 3 are pretty good > indications of the Buchla sound and touchplates. > > Regards,
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Fwd: doepfer's comments about the TKB.
2003-11-08 by p. hendricks
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.