Doepfer

Yeah, an integrated/normalized VCO-VCF-VCF-EG module could be a real 
practical space-saver.
In principle, the A-109 with additional VCO and EG would fit the bill
But my own preference would be for a 12 db filter and a simple ADR EG 
(like in ASol's SY01)

Regards
Joost

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "TonyBlack [JohnnyBusca]" 
<JohnnyBusca@t...> wrote:
> I also like to see a voice card.
> 
> I was able to buy a Doepfer VMS voicecard based on CEM33x0s. Right 
now
> it's being fixed, but I'm very happy with it..
> 
> (picture of the VMS in the upperleft corner:
> http://www.tonyblack.org/images/allmodular.jpg )
> 
> Scanned circuits:
> http://www.synrise.de/user/user_8.htm
> 
> Best regards,
> Johnny
> 
> 
> > Message: 19
> >    Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 20:58:17 -0700
> >    From: James Husted <james@e...>
> > Subject: module Ideas...
> >
> > 1) I would love to see a dedicated "voice module", something like 
a
> > Oberheim SEM module. It could even be made of current modules just
> > packaged into a single smaller panel. It would have a similar 
feature
> > set as a SEM, 2 VCOs (switchable or mixable at the filter wave-
shapes),
> > a simple LFO (maybe with switchable wave-shapes - VC not even 
needed),
> > 2 Envelope generators (ADSRs not ASRs like the SEM unless the size
> > restricts it to ASR), a Multimode filter, and a VCA (or a stereo
> > panner/VCA) all with simple inputs and outputs normalized to a 
standard
> > mono voice patch. The minimum patching needed would be a single 
CV and
> > Gate, but the normalization could be broken to make available 
separate
> > CVs for the VCOs and VCF, and gates for the different EGs. The 
main
> > thing is to make the feature set is flexible with a emphasis on 
small
> > size. There are many times where a "standard" voice architecture 
is
> > useful and the ease of patching would be great. The development 
time
> > would be minimal since the modules used have all been developed
> > already. It is just a packaging exercise.
> >