Hi, Peter. Looking at Doepfer's hp chart on his website, it look slike the closest hp equivelent would be 18hp, which is a theoretical 91.44mm. However, Doepfer tends to leave about .3 mm for tolerance, so maybe if you increased the width to 91.10 it would work betternas an 18 hp module. Also, it is very important that the mounting holes be exactly 7.5mm (appx 1.5hp) from the edge of the module. This would make it much easier for those of us with pre-drilled Doepfer mounting holes. By the way, I am somewhat mathematically challenged, so please check these figures before relying on my work. (Although I have gotten a number of panels from front oanel express that worked just fine) The Doepfer spec page is here:http://www.doepfer.de/home_e.htm By the way, please put me down for a couple of these oscilators as well. (And I suppose I've gotta come up with more space for Doepfer's advanced oscilators when they come out as well. Looks like its time for a new house. Why couldn't I have just been a drug addict?) SHM --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you can figure that out)" <peter@b...> wrote: > Thanks to all of you for responding. It looks like we've passed > the ten peice minimum and I will begin this process. I will be in > touch with all of you shortly. > > For a matter of reference, I may have screwed up in the width > spec for this device. The faceplate is currently 90mm wide. If > that's a problem for creting a blank spece in a rack (odd size), > somebody please let me know and I can make it a little wider. > we HATE blank spaces! > > best, > > Peter
Message
Re: VCO: Made the minimum, it's a go..
2004-06-29 by shm1400
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.