Correction to my last post: While the left mounting screws should be 7.5 mm from the left side, I think the right mounting screws need to be a multiple of 5.08 mm away from the left screws. If you used my suggested measurements for the module and left a tolerance of .34 mm, this should presumably be subtracted from the right side distance, meaning that the screws should be 4.1 mm (7.5 - 3.4) from the right side. The only panels I have yet made were 8hp with single mounting holes, so I am making a lot of untested assumptions here. Somebody with more knowledge please help. SHM --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "shm1400" <shm14@h...> wrote: > Hi, Peter. > > Looking at Doepfer's hp chart on his website, it look slike the > closest hp equivelent would be 18hp, which is a theoretical > 91.44mm. However, Doepfer tends to leave about .3 mm for tolerance, > so maybe if you increased the width to 91.10 it would work betternas > an 18 hp module. Also, it is very important that the mounting holes > be exactly 7.5mm (appx 1.5hp) from the edge of the module. This > would make it much easier for those of us with pre-drilled Doepfer > mounting holes. > > By the way, I am somewhat mathematically challenged, so please check > these figures before relying on my work. (Although I have gotten a > number of panels from front oanel express that worked just fine) The > Doepfer spec page is here:http://www.doepfer.de/home_e.htm > > By the way, please put me down for a couple of these oscilators as > well. (And I suppose I've gotta come up with more space for > Doepfer's advanced oscilators when they come out as well. Looks like > its time for a new house. Why couldn't I have just been a drug > addict?) > > SHM > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you can figure that > out)" <peter@b...> wrote: > > Thanks to all of you for responding. It looks like we've passed > > the ten peice minimum and I will begin this process. I will be in > > touch with all of you shortly. > > > > For a matter of reference, I may have screwed up in the width > > spec for this device. The faceplate is currently 90mm wide. If > > that's a problem for creting a blank spece in a rack (odd size), > > somebody please let me know and I can make it a little wider. > > we HATE blank spaces! > > > > best, > > > > Peter
Message
Re: VCO: Made the minimum, it's a go..
2004-06-29 by shm1400
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.