Doepfer

And if you're working from an analog sequencer strict tracking doesn't
matter at all, much less diving off into something weirder.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mritenburg [mailto:mritenburg@yahoo.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 9:45 AM
> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: New poll for Doepfer_a100
> 
> 
> > > advantage of the a111 expansion module in combination
> > > to the a111 triangle output would be,for sure, the
> > > better tracking.(i think the a111+expander combi will
> > > track for 7 or more octaves ,as the a111 does, and not
> > > for only 4 octaves)
> > > as for the sound and exact features compared to the
> > > buchla 259,i don't know yet.
> > > bakis.
> 
> 
> Having first hand experience with Buchla 259s, I will just say that 
> tracking is not everything.  There are features to the design, range 
> and performance of the 259 that far outweigh any short comings in 
> tracking.  As Peter Grenader points out for his VCO based on the 
> Buchla 258 "It's designed use is more geared toward 'what goes up, 
> may go sideways' electronic music and not so much for realizing your 
> favorite Bach tocatta. There are scads of VCOs on the market for this 
> already. While they may track to a larger range, cannot conjure the 
> timbral pleasures of the Model 15." 
> 
> I say vote for the 259!
> 
> Matthew
>