Hi, Any new VCO would probably only go into my next system which might only come about in the distant future (:O) , but I am also disappointed about Dieter's (potential) decision and hope to add my voice to the chorus urging him against this. As far as scruples or ethics go, I think Brandon hit the nail on the head: >Anyone who can afford 200e modules will buy the real buchla over the >doepfer-buchla, and anyone who can't afford the 200e modules is not a >potential buchla customer. However, I have never seen or heard a Buchla anything (much less had my hands on one) and the few recordings I have been pointed to certainly didn't make me think 'hmmm I have to have one of those' in the way that some moog modular recordings have done. What I would like more than a Buchla clone is Dieter's take on an uber-VCO like the Buchla, but with its own unique spicing, kind of like his interpretation of an ms20 filter (which, even on the few samples I have heard, knocks the original into a cocked hat, IMHO). I would therefore argue against a slavish copy (and the necessity of getting the exact specs) and rather in favour of a module that would enable us to explore similar sonic territories but in its own way. I would like to see Dieter add to the legacy rather than simply perpetuating it. The past is passed. just my $0.02 Pierre _________________________________________________________________ Win mobile goodies at MSN Mobile Fun! http://ringtones.msn.co.za/
Message
RE: [Doepfer_a100] Digest Number 968
2004-09-28 by Pierre Zeeman
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.