Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: "analogue processing module" details from doepfer.

2004-10-07 by James Husted

I agree that separate module frontpanels dedicated to the different 
functions would be a better idea. That way the main "guts" of the 
module can be made in quantities that would reduce cost. An option of a 
"universal" module panel with a midi or such programmable input could 
be an option also. That would raise the hassle of software programs, 
but would offer the most flexibility, especially if the module 
"remembers" the config data after programming, thus allowing the 
programmer to run multiple modules in a rig. This module has many 
applications like scale conversion, complex LFO etc. Very exciting.

-James

On Oct 6, 2004, at 11:28 PM, selfoscillate wrote:
>
> yes, absolutely. i'm looking forward to these modules.
> i'd prefer separate modules instead of one module with all
> the functions.
>
> best wishes
>
> ingo

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.