Doepfer

Sounds like you need to have a touch screen on the front of this unit that has a menu
select on it. Maybe this needs to be three separate units instead for more dedicated
functions. Isnt there a module like this already out there!? Where code is fed from a
pc to the module? Why reinvent the wheel?

--- James Husted <ersatzplanet@mac.com> wrote:

> I agree that separate module frontpanels dedicated to the different 
> functions would be a better idea. That way the main "guts" of the 
> module can be made in quantities that would reduce cost. An option of a 
> "universal" module panel with a midi or such programmable input could 
> be an option also. That would raise the hassle of software programs, 
> but would offer the most flexibility, especially if the module 
> "remembers" the config data after programming, thus allowing the 
> programmer to run multiple modules in a rig. This module has many 
> applications like scale conversion, complex LFO etc. Very exciting.
> 
> -James
> 
> On Oct 6, 2004, at 11:28 PM, selfoscillate wrote:
> >
> > yes, absolutely. i'm looking forward to these modules.
> > i'd prefer separate modules instead of one module with all
> > the functions.
> >
> > best wishes
> >
> > ingo
> 
> 



		
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com