hello pierre, couldn't agree more with you! i also have a technosaurus selector system-D that costs a lot of money, but my doepfer a100 with it's million of possibilities is still my favourite, if i had to choose one of them only. of course, i also like the technosaurus fat sound, but it hasn't the limitless potential of my a100! also the doepfer a100 has NOT a lesser or thinner sound than my more expensive technosaurus selector. it just has a DIFFERENT sound! i think that the doepfer a100 plus the AS rs-integrator are both great modulars regarding value for money and sound and size! bakis. --- Pierre Zeeman <pierrezee@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > >(I basically want an excuse not to buy the voyager) > > I have both but I bought the voyager after I already > had a 12U doepfer+AS > system. One of the reasons why I bought it was to > use as a controller for > my modular. The value of the voyager increases > greatly if you have a > modular synth because you can then fully utilise all > of its cv ins and outs > (there is always a forest of patch leads running > from the voyager to the > modular :D). Make no mistake, it's a lovely > sounding instrument but it is > limited and if you're a tweaker you will ultimately > become frustrated with a > voyager on its own as there are only so many sounds > you can make with a > fixed osc->filter->vca architecture. If I had to > choose, I would go for the > doepfer. The doepfer can cover almost all the > ground the voyager can and > then go far beyond it. Admittedly the doepfer > doesn't have that moogy > thing, but then that thing has been beaten to death > over the last 30 years. > Not surprisingly, what I like most about the voyager > is that it has its own > sound, quite different to its forebears (although it > does the moog sound > well enough if you're so inclined to want it). I am > very glad I have both - > they play very nicely together. > > As for the choice of modular, doepfer would actually > be my first choice even > if I had a lot more money simply because of the > small size (dotcom and motm > get huge very, very quickly) and the massive and > amazing range of modules > offered. Plus, they interoperate with the other > eurorack and fracrack > modulars (both blacet and wiard make lovely modules) > and Paul Schreiber of > MOTM is apparently toying with the idea of releasing > his modules in doepfer > format as well so the range of possibilities is only > going to increase. > > Some many choices, so little cash :) > > rds > > Pierre > > _________________________________________________________________ > Access content from thousands of news providers, > only on MSN Search! > http://search.msn.co.za > > ===== Bakis Siros Parallel Worlds / Polariton Athens-Greece [Doepfer_a100] group owner http://www.shimarecords.co.uk http://www.ward12.com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] RE: doepfer vs.....???
2005-02-10 by Bakis Sirros
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.