Doepfer

I just as fully disagree.  An extra 2P on any two modules in a row and you
just lost space for a clock divider, sample-and-hold, ring mod, inverter, or
multiple.  Couple that with the price of a G6 and you'll find yourself
spending hundreds of extra dollars/euros for the privilege of a nominally
neater rack.

--Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: selfoscillate [mailto:synaptic_music@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 7:56 AM
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Instead of new module suggestions -> module size




hello florian,

i fully agree.

best wishes

ingo



--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Florian Anwander 
<Florian.Anwander@c...> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I received a lot of new modules the last weeks. So I rearranged the 
> modules in my system ... and found it quite annoying, that there 
are 
> again modules with a width of uneven or impairy numbers of HPs. I 
really 
> would appreciate it, if the modules would have at least a width of 
4HPs 
> (like A180) and multiples of 4HPs.
> 
> I wouldn't mind if some modules would have more surface space; this 
> would make a more user friendly "interface". It would be easier 
also to 
> add input jacks or switches for optional features, which are given 
on 
> the pcb already.
> 
> Any oppinions about that? (I know that we would have to buy more 
19" 
> frames...)
> 
> Florian