thanks florian, i totaly agree with you in the comparison between MOTM(or other expensive modulars)and DOEPFER!!! also,i think you are right about this endless discussion about the upgrade of regelwerk/shaltwerk...(but,please let's not reply to each other with "shut up"and things like that,o.k.??:-)...) by the way,i don't have a MAQ,or regelwek,or shaltwerk,so i can't say anything about them,really....but as far as i know dieter,is a very nice man,that cares about his customers,and does what he does because he loves his work,not just to make money...,o.k.??so,if he tells us that it's difficult to upgrade the shaltwerk/regelwerk,he must be right...after all, let's see how many people are ready to pay these extra 300 euros for a hardware upgrade.if you see that are more that 10(according to the polls), then please address your requests directly to doepfer or chris assall.) AND I TOTALLY AGREE WITH DOEPFER ON HIS INTEREST TO ALWAYS DEVELOP MORE NEW MODULES FOR THE A100!!!THAT'S THE MAIN BEAUTY OF A MODULAR SYNTHESIZER... AND,AGAIN,DOEPFER MODULES ARE GIVING EVERYONE MANY FEATURES FOR A GOOD PRICE(a thing that you can't say about MOTM,TECHNOSAURUS or SERGE and all those overpriced modulars,o.k.???) just think of one thing:if serge would release a sensor-keyboard like the new one from deopfer(see the doepfer site!!!)it would cost,at least,DOUBLE THE PRICE(or triple???),and probably fewer people could afford it!!!!!!!!!! that's my opinion. keep on synthesizing,everyone... synthfreak BAKIS(not bakkis!!!) SIRROS. --- Florian Anwander <Florian.Anwander@consol.de> wrote: > Sorry guys, > > but this is an ugly reply to the demands of many > people here: > > > > Doepfer offers and sells modules with dedicated > features announced. These > features are forfilled. There were only very very > few real technical bugs, > which reduced the announced features; as far as I > know the owners of the > corresponing modules were informed personally and > the repair was initiated > by Doepfer. This is more than the usual of the > standard behaviour of other > producers. > > > What you all expect is the fix of (to your > opinion > annoying) lack of features. > > > > To stay in the car comparison: You bought a > Volkswagen, now you find, that > it does not include air conditioning and its > instruments panel is made from > simple plastic instead of maple wood. So you expect > Volkswagen AG to make a > Mercedes out of your beetle. > > Now you want Doepfer to make a MOTM-Standard out of > the A-100 modules. What > do you think Doepfer is? A social station? A > Doepfer module usually costs > less than the half of a MOTM module (I just compared > the MOTM price list > with Doepfers prices: often only 25% to 35% of MOTM > !!!). So i think you > can be DAMNED LUCKY that it provides 90 percent of > the technical features > and three quarter of the mechanical quality. > > > > A Mercedes is a nice car. Nothing to say against it, > but please stop > complaining about the fact that you were so stingy > to afford only a > Volkswagen. IF YOU WANT A MERCEDES, THEN PAY FOR IT. > > If you don't have the money, then shut up! > > Florian > ===== synthfreak(parallel worlds) athens-greece [Doepfer_a100] group owner-moderator __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Poll regarding Bugfixing
2002-02-25 by bakis Sirros
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.