hello bryan, the wiard noise ring and the a149/1 are quite different and they were designed for different purposes. both have outputs for 2^n and n+1 states, both use a shift register, but the rest cannot be compared. the wiard noise ring is clocked by an internal oscillator, it is not possible to clock it with an external gate signal. the minimum frequency of the internal clock is 1 hz, which is not really slow. the maximum frequency is 10 khz, so the module is more suitable to run in the audio range. you can control the randomness and how often changes occour. therefore the noise ring is very usable as a chaos oscillator, as it can produce real tones at certain settings, besides all the different noise shapes. it won't give you really slow control voltages for your vco's or vcf's and it won't run "in sync" with your sequencer or with your keyboard-playing. in contrast it can provide modulations, noises and rough tones which are unavailable elsewhere and it is a great inspirational source for experimentalists. the a149/1 random voltage module has to be clocked by an external gate or trigger pulse, therefore it can run "in sync" with a sequencer. the module outputs quantized and stored voltages. you can control the number of possible states or the distribution of high/low values. this makes the a149/1 much more suitable for generating control voltages, for instance to control your vco's or vcf's. clocked at audio frequency, it will output a noise signal only, but no tones. the a149/1 is great for those who want a more musical control over the random voltages. best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Bryan E Cornell" <bcor@l...> wrote: > I'm wondering if the a-149-1 (Quantized/Stored Random Voltages) is very similar to the Wiard Noise Ring. It appears to be similar, but it switches between a high, a low and a medium state while the Wiard unit switches from a high and a low state. > > Does anybody have both of these units or experience with both of them? I'm on the prowl for the stranger Doepfer units and want to know if the 149-1 would add anything significant to my system. > > Bryan > > Bryan Cornell > Reference Librarian > Recorded Sound Reference Center > Motion Picture, Broadcasting and Recorded Sound Division > Library of Congress, Washington, DC 20540-4698 > Phone: (202) 707-7833 > Fax: (202) 707-8464 > email: bcor@l... > Usual disclaimers apply.
Message
Re: a149-1 vs Wiard Noise Ring
2005-04-25 by selfoscillate
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.