hello ernst, as long as you use the a149/1 in dieters patch, there will be no voltage output below the "lower" offset, because the a149/1 outputs only positive voltages. best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, *--* <heinrich.himmelwasser@g...> wrote: > Hello Dieter, > > The patches you describe here are both close to the unit I tried to decribe > (thanks for that!!). > However the lower voltage as an offset is a misunderstanding. > For as far as I remember it was so with the TMG at sonology that if you put > the lower and upper voltages > on the same level that it would only output that voltage. In both your > patches it also generates output below.. > Maybe I'm wrong.. But I will defianately start investigating. > And also I would still be interested in a modulel ike this, saves a lot of > patchcords and modules I can use in the rest of the patch. ;-) > Anyway I will get back on this later this week after I have contacted my > sources at Sonology. > > Friendly greetings, > > Ernst > > On 9/21/05, Dieter Doepfer <hardware@d...> wrote: > > > > From my understanding this can realized with an A-149-1, VCA (e.g. A-132) > > and mixer (e.g. A-138a). The clock is the A-149-1 clock, lower CV goes to > > one A-138a input (kind of mixer offset), the A-149-1 output is processes > > by > > a VCA with VCA CV as upper CV, the VCA output goes to another mixer input. > > The mixer output is the Tendency mask generator output. The A-149- 1 could > > also be replaced by an random module A-118 and a S&H A-148. In this case > > the > > clock goes to the A-148 clock input. > > > > I don't think that it justifies a new module even though it would be no > > problem for us. > > > > Best wishes > > Dieter Doepfer > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: Poll results for Doepfer_a100
2005-09-26 by selfoscillate
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.