Doepfer

Hi

Dieter Doepfer wrote:
> So the HCVSO goes up to 200kHz, resulting in 100kHz BBD clock and
> consequently 10.24ms delay time.
ok, so we should do a little survey here:  To my opinion 10ms as minimum 
delay I would say, there is no real "flanging" effect possible. Flanging 
is a modulation of center delaytimes between 1ms and 8-10 ms. Everything 
with delaytimes larger than 10ms I would call "chorus". Still a nice 
effect, but it will lack those 'narrow' and 'claustrophobic' aspect of a 
good flanger or very short delays.

> suggestion and put a so-so 1V/Oct HSVCO into the BBD module but offer an
> external clock input (normalled to the internal HSVCO) that enables to drive
> the unit from an external precision HSVCO (I hope we will be able to design
> a better - but even more expensive - HSVCO in the near future).
This sounds very reasonable.

> My comment to Karplus/Strong and similar:
> For these applications I'd prefer the announced universal AD/processor/DA
> module. 
I agree with this tooo.

> At the moment we prefer
> the adjustment of the memory length with up/down buttons (e.g.
> 2/4/8/16/32/64/128 ..... 1M) and a 3-digit LED display (the decimal points
> could indicate "kilo" and "mega").
Giving devils advocat: What about a CV-controllable division factor?


> b.t.w. The SC filter prototype working as well. To speak the truth: it's not
> very exciting from my point of view. Just a chaste, clean filter having not
> very much character to my estimation. Maybe I use to often the A-106-1,
> A-107 and A-124 ...
Thats what the SC-Filter sounds like. It is only really interesting 
because of the steep cutoff slope (and also because it can simply 
connected to any kind of sampling rate). How steep will the slope of the 
SC-Filter-module be?

Florian