Doepfer

if the module had two 512 stage bbds and two clocks, with the  
possibilty to feed the output of stage 1 into stage 2 (maybe an input  
socket on stage two normalised to output 1 )and the option of sharing  
one clock between both delay lines (switchable, perhaps with an  
external gate signal), you could use it as two seperate units, a stereo  
unit, or one long delay with two taps (and optionally two different  
samplerates...:-) )
in a way like the vactrol phaser....

greetz,
denis


Am 20.10.2005 um 11:40 schrieb David Salter:

> There's nothing to stop Dieter from having two BBD chips on the module
>  with a single LFO/VCO and a switch socket for the second BBD so you  
> can
>  modulate them separately.
>
>  David Salter
>  Senior Project Manager
>  Reuters Ltd
>  Tel       +44 20 7542 2402
>  Mob     +44 7990562402
>  email    david.salter@reuters.com
>  RM       david.salter.reuters@reuters.net
>
>
>
>  ________________________________
>
>  From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com  
> [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]
>  On Behalf Of selfoscillate
>  Sent: 20 October 2005 09:32
>  To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
>  Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: BBD module first mp3 sound clips!!! -> two
>  BBDs
>
>
>
>  hello florian,
>
>  i had that idea for two bbd-chips on one module
>  because i think this enables the user to obtain
>  delay, chorusing and flanging with only one module,
>  so there is no need to decide which one should buy,
>  because the module does it all.
>  different outputs are not expensive to add and probably
>  give nice stereo effects. after all a module with two
>  bbd's will be cheaper that two separate modules,
>  and it will keep dieter from offering two modules,
>  which will further lower the price.
>
>  i can see that two modules offer even more possibilities,
>  but nothing keeps us from buying two modules anyway.
>
>  best wishes
>
>  ingo
>
>
>
>  --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Florian Anwander
>  <Florian.Anwander@c...> wrote:
>  >
>  > Hi Bakis
>  >
>  > Hmm, sorry; perhaps now I spoil ingo's suggestion, but I think it
>  would
>  > be a waste of ressource.
>  > If I have two BBDs, I want to modulate their clock from different
>  > modulation sources in 80 percent of all cases. Lets take as example
>  the
>  > famous Roland chorus, which is two BBDs whereone is modulated
>  direct by
>  > the LFO the other by the inverted LFO signal.
>  >
>  > Either I'd like to have two separate modules or at least one module
>  with
>  > two separate delaylines. There are a lot of famous BBD-based
>  devices
>  > like the Dynacord TAM-21, the A/DA or the Roland Dimension-D. At
>  the
>  > moment these examples look like the targets of a possible Doepfer
>  > BBD-module, but they should be the starting point from where a
>  > developement goes further on.
>  >
>  > Florian
>  >
>  >
>  > Bakis Sirros wrote:
>  >
>  > > hello dieter,
>  > > ingo's idea of putting two different stages BBD's into
>  > > each module is great.
>  > > as i always say, the more capabilities, sockets and
>  > > knobs in a module, the better.
>  > > best regards,
>  > > bakis.
>  >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  SPONSORED LINKS
>  A100
>   
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads? 
> t=ms&k=A100&w1=A100&w2=Modular+system&w3=S
>   
> ynthesizer&w4=Electronic+payment&w5=Electronic+test+equipment&w6=Guitar 
> +
>  synthesizer&c=6&s=126&.sig=7qk4KfDanDiWmDiNwkErZA>        Modular  
> system
>   
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads? 
> t=ms&k=Modular+system&w1=A100&w2=Modular+s
>   
> ystem&w3=Synthesizer&w4=Electronic+payment&w5=Electronic+test+equipment 
> &
>  w6=Guitar+synthesizer&c=6&s=126&.sig=hHqbBveG60BFBUgxUgOrwQ>
>  Synthesizer
>   
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads? 
> t=ms&k=Synthesizer&w1=A100&w2=Modular+syst
>   
> em&w3=Synthesizer&w4=Electronic+payment&w5=Electronic+test+equipment&w6 
> =
>  Guitar+synthesizer&c=6&s=126&.sig=TkVI4dZwQYtej5a8axJk6A>       
>  Electronic payment
>   
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads? 
> t=ms&k=Electronic+payment&w1=A100&w2=Modul
>   
> ar+system&w3=Synthesizer&w4=Electronic+payment&w5=Electronic+test+equip 
> m
>  ent&w6=Guitar+synthesizer&c=6&s=126&.sig=A8SEMukXwntRihU64CJcYw>
>  Electronic test equipment
>   
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads? 
> t=ms&k=Electronic+test+equipment&w1=A100&w
>   
> 2=Modular+system&w3=Synthesizer&w4=Electronic+payment&w5=Electronic+tes 
> t
>   
> +equipment&w6=Guitar+synthesizer&c=6&s=126&.sig=PL6Pwu2HodmGUNuOO8bogQ>
>  Guitar synthesizer
>   
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads? 
> t=ms&k=Guitar+synthesizer&w1=A100&w2=Modul
>   
> ar+system&w3=Synthesizer&w4=Electronic+payment&w5=Electronic+test+equip 
> m
>  ent&w6=Guitar+synthesizer&c=6&s=126&.sig=3frDmfcEV4WWrJJ1dkws0w>   
>      
>
>  ________________________________
>
>  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>       
>  *      Visit your group "Doepfer_a100
>  <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100> " on the web.
>         
>  *      To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>        Doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>  <mailto:Doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>         
>  *      Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>  Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
>
>
>  ________________________________
>
>
>
>
>  -----------------------------------------------------------------
>          Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
>
>  To find out more about Reuters Products and Services visit  
> http://www.reuters.com/productinfo
>
>  Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
>  sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
>  the views of Reuters Ltd.
>
>
>
>  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> 	▪ 	 Visit your group "Doepfer_a100" on the web.
>  
> 	▪ 	 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  Doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>  
> 	▪ 	 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of  
> Service.
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]