Doepfer

In case that the BBD module will be manufactured with 2 BBDs (I'm still
waiting for the answer of the BBD manufacturer ...) we will add a separate
clock socket for each BBD (normalled to the internal HSVCO) in any case. But
the A-163 will probably not be suitable as it was designed for audio
frequencies only. I'll have to ask Christian what is the max. possible clock
input frequency of the A-163 (it's software based and uses a PIC
microcontroller).

Best wishes
Dieter

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]Im Auftrag von Anton Coops
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. Oktober 2005 11:42
> An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> Betreff: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: BBD module first mp3 sound clips!!! ->
> two BBDs
>
>
> Don't know if this is possible, but if it will be 2 bbd's, wouldn't it be
> nice to have a hsvco-output and two clock inserts, one for each bbd,
> so you can e.g. insert the a-163. That way you can have 1/2, 1/3,
> 1/4, 1/6, 1/8 etc. of the delay-time for each bbd without changing
> the 'master' delay-time parameter.
>
> On 20 Oct 2005, at 8:32, selfoscillate wrote:
>
> >
> > hello florian,
> >
> > i had that idea for two bbd-chips on one module
> > because i think this enables the user to obtain
> > delay, chorusing and flanging with only one module,
> > so there is no need to decide which one should buy,
> > because the module does it all.
> > different outputs are not expensive to add and probably
> > give nice stereo effects. after all a module with two
> > bbd's will be cheaper that two separate modules,
> > and it will keep dieter from offering two modules,
> > which will further lower the price.
> >
> > i can see that two modules offer even more possibilities,
> > but nothing keeps us from buying two modules anyway.
> >
> > best wishes
> >
> > ingo
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Florian Anwander
> > <Florian.Anwander@c...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Bakis
> > >
> > > Hmm, sorry; perhaps now I spoil ingo's suggestion, but I think it
> > would
> > > be a waste of ressource.
> > > If I have two BBDs, I want to modulate their clock from different
> > > modulation sources in 80 percent of all cases. Lets take as example
> > the
> > > famous Roland chorus, which is two BBDs whereone is modulated
> > direct by
> > > the LFO the other by the inverted LFO signal.
> > >
> > > Either I'd like to have two separate modules or at least one module
> > with
> > > two separate delaylines. There are a lot of famous BBD-based
> > devices
> > > like the Dynacord TAM-21, the A/DA or the Roland Dimension-D. At
> > the
> > > moment these examples look like the targets of a possible Doepfer
> > > BBD-module, but they should be the starting point from where a
> > > developement goes further on.
> > >
> > > Florian
> > >
> > >
> > > Bakis Sirros wrote:
> > >
> > > > hello dieter,
> > > > ingo's idea of putting two different stages BBD's into
> > > > each module is great.
> > > > as i always say, the more capabilities, sockets and
> > > > knobs in a module, the better.
> > > > best regards,
> > > > bakis.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>