Hey sfrules Thanks for the support :-) > Now I find I must absorb Sethares' book! Be sure to get the second edition from 2005, it's improved. > Knowing you may also have trod in these other footsteps as well, may > I recommend > Wendy Carlos' CD's, BEAUTY IN THE BEAST and TALES OF HEAVEN & HELL. > She uses microtonal to advantage. Thanks, I will keep those in mind. She is also quoted by Sethares. > I suppose it's obvious to you and everyone else that merely > attenuating keyboard voltage will give you octaves of any number of > steps you wish. True, but this method is not allways what you want, especially the user-friendliness, but also the possibilities. As far as I know it's impossible e.g. to use the a-156 quantiser (12-tet) to divide an octave in 5 equal steps. It seems you can only shrink the intervals, but not increase them. But perhaps I'm missing a clever trick here? Also the future Doepfer cv-keyboard might be handy. I recall reading somewhere that there are two other > mathematical divisions of an octave that create consonance - > something like 29 and 36 steps. Do you know what those actual > divisions may be? Thanking in advance. I wouldn't know what you mean, as consonance is not just a matter of division of the octave. But my guess is that you mean 19 instead of 29. > If you've been around a while - and I think you have - you may recall > my supplication for a selective quantizer. Without going into > detail, I'll just attach the jpg in the middle of this post. oops, it's gone I think? Greetings Anton
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] suggestion for alternative quantizing module
2005-11-05 by Anton Coops
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.