Doepfer

andreas,
it's NOT my job to moderate this group,o.k.???
i do it because i like my modular.if any of you have
better answers to some of the questions asked in this
group,go ahead and write them!!!
i have many other things to do during the day...so i
hardly have the time for giving better answers.
bakis.

--- Andreas Lindholm <andreas.k.lindholm@telia.com>
wrote:
> Glad you did voice your opionion Tris. We need more
> voices in here cause I
> feel it if only three or four people that do write
> stuff and I have pretty
> much nailed down what their  response post different
> post will be in
> advance. It gets a bit dull waiting for the expected
> (we could use an A118
> ;).
> 
> Hope more people wake up, I think and hope that
> Doepfer benefits from a
> bigger interesst rather than hide from non euphoric
> users.
> 
> /Andreas as always
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "thepeak" <thepeak@btinternet.com>
> To: <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 10:29 PM
> Subject: RE: [Doepfer_a100] A little about that
> touch keyboard
> 
> 
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I don't contribute all that often; I do make the
> time to read as much as I
> > can with regards to this group.  The touch sensor
> keyboard should surely
> be
> > just that.  No sequencer, simply a touch sensitive
> board.  It is then up
> to
> > the individual to incorporate it as they see fit. 
> The maq is cracking
> > sequencer, as is the a155, as I understand are AS
> and the like.  Let
> doepfer
> > use the time to improve the ******werk sequencers.
>  They have the
> potential
> > to be the most elaborate of all hardware/analogue
> style sequencers ever.
> My
> > main gripe with the schaltwerk is the inability to
> write patterns on the
> fly
> > longer than 16 notes.  (Without pasting it over to
> a new pattern) Roland
> > managed it with the TR909 and that was some time
> ago and until the
> > schaltwerk is capable of achieving immediate
> writing of notes on a pattern
> > of greater than 16.
> >
> > Regards
> >  To all
> >
> > Tris
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: david.salter@reuters.com
> [mailto:david.salter@reuters.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:11 PM
> > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] A little about that
> touch keyboard
> >
> >
> > I agree that if a sequencer is to be incorporated
> into the touch keyboard
> it
> > has to be fully integrated.
> >
> > The point that has been made by some people,
> myself included is that it
> can
> > be an add on and it would have to offer more than
> a155 (just as you
> > intimate).
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> >
> >                     bakis Sirros
> >                     <synth_freak_2000@       To:
> > Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> >                     yahoo.com>               cc:
> >                                              
> Subject:     Re:
> > [Doepfer_a100] A little about that touch keyboard
> >                     27/02/2002 13:47         
> Header:      Internal Use
> Only
> >                     Please respond to
> >                     Doepfer_a100
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ooooooo.......don't you understand that this
> sequencer
> > NEEDS to be with the sensor keyboard???the keys of
> the
> > keyboard are used for activating steps/changing
> > seq.lenght on the fly!!!so,it is nessessary to
> have a
> > touch-sensor keyboard/sequencer!!!!!!!!!
> > synthfreak
> >
> > --- davevosh@aol.com wrote:
> > > In a message dated 2/26/2002 12:12:07 PM Eastern
> > > Standard Time,
> > > andreas.k.lindholm@telia.com writes:
> > >
> > >
> > > > If the touch keyboard would amount to anything
> > > good I would say that it
> > > > should either exclude all sequencer functions
> or
> > > they should be very
> > > > carefully thought out. There is as far as I
> > > understand it no point in adding
> > > > something that if very limited when there are
> > > several other solutions to do
> > > > it better.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > hello !
> > > i must agree here wholeheartedly !  better a
> > > superior touch kybd / controller
> > > than a mediocre sequencer.  after the kybd is
> > > completed, take a second look a
> > > sequencing and envelope generation using
> something
> > > still visionary, even
> > > after all these years, like the old buchla
> multiple
> > > arbitrary random function
> > > generator as a conceptual starting point.
> > > let each module "be what it is" and avoid
> "creeping
> > > feature-itis" ..........
> > > best,
> > > dave
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> > > removed]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > =====
> > synthfreak(parallel worlds)
> > athens-greece
> > [Doepfer_a100] group owner-moderator
> >
> >
> >
> >                Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> >
> >
> >
> >                    ADVERTISEMENT
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> Terms of Service.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
-------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> >         Visit our Internet site at
> http://www.reuters.com
> 
=== message truncated ===


=====
synthfreak(parallel worlds)
athens-greece
[Doepfer_a100] group owner-moderator

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion!
http://greetings.yahoo.com