Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Thread

Splitting up the CV

Splitting up the CV

2002-11-16 by :::M 3 D I U M:::

I have a system with the following modules:

A110
A1102
118
114
115
116
117
130
119 
136
145
160
161
180
138 (x2)
171
140 (x2)

I have a  a Clarity midi-CV Unit, I usually run one channel of midi to the
midi-CV Unit, with a output of pair of gate/cv.  Since I have 2 osc. I like
to fatten up the sound with the 2nd osc. Running detuned a bit or an octave
below. If I just have one cv source plug, what is the best way to sync the
two osc? I need an inverse mixer, should I use the 180 where I can input a
signal and break it out to multiple outputs,  Or do I work with the H-sync
on the 110-2? 

Thanks in advance.

Coleman.

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Splitting up the CV

2002-11-17 by bakis Sirros

hi coleman,
i don't exactly understand your question,but:if you
just want to run a two vco patch from one cv
cable,just split the cv signal with the a180(but you
will rather need an a185 bus access module for cv
buffering/better tuning!).if you want to run a two vco
patch with synced vco's, just do the same as above
and,also,connect one of the waveform outputs of the
master vco to the sync input of the slave vco.for a
better sync sound ,the freq. of the master vco has to
be lower than the freq. of the slave vco.(and don't
forget to modulate the pitch of the slave vco with an
lfo,adsr,etc.)
i hope that helps...
bakis.




--- : : M 3 D I U M: : : Sat Nov 16 10: 12:
35@yahoo.com,
UNEXPECTED_DATA_AFTER_ADDRESS_IN_GROUP@.SYNTAX-ERROR.;;;;;;;,
":::M 3 D I U M:::" <horn@m3dium.com> wrote:
> I have a system with the following modules:
> 
> A110
> A1102
> 118
> 114
> 115
> 116
> 117
> 130
> 119 
> 136
> 145
> 160
> 161
> 180
> 138 (x2)
> 171
> 140 (x2)
> 
> I have a  a Clarity midi-CV Unit, I usually run one
> channel of midi to the
> midi-CV Unit, with a output of pair of gate/cv. 
> Since I have 2 osc. I like
> to fatten up the sound with the 2nd osc. Running
> detuned a bit or an octave
> below. If I just have one cv source plug, what is
> the best way to sync the
> two osc? I need an inverse mixer, should I use the
> 180 where I can input a
> signal and break it out to multiple outputs,  Or do
> I work with the H-sync
> on the 110-2? 
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Coleman.
> 
> 


=====
synthfreak(parallel worlds)
athens-greece
[Doepfer_a100] group owner-moderator

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com

Re: Splitting up the CV

2002-11-18 by Joe Buechler

Hi Coleman

In general, the A180 Multiples is the module used to split a single 
CV or audio signal to several destinations. As bakis mentioned, 
though, it isn't very good for pitch CV. That's because it isn't 
buffered, so there's inevitably a voltage drop. For most 
applications, the voltage drop doesn't matter, but with pitch CV it 
throws the tuning off.

The A185 Bus Access module is better for this. It buffers the pitch CV 
and feeds it to the system bus, where its routed to all of the VCOs 
without any additional patching required (it also routes the gate 
signal to all of the A145s). There's two pairs of output jacks on 
the A185 that you can use for things like VCF pitch tracking.

If you don't have an A100 system bus (your modules aren't plugged into 
a Doepfer bus board) the other alternative is to get a buffered 
multiple. Analog Systems makes one, the RS230. The Analog Solutions 
MX224 would also work.

Joe

Joe

--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., bakis Sirros <synth_freak_2000@y...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> hi coleman,
> i don't exactly understand your question,but:if you
> just want to run a two vco patch from one cv
> cable,just split the cv signal with the a180(but you
> will rather need an a185 bus access module for cv
> buffering/better tuning!).if you want to run a two vco
> patch with synced vco's, just do the same as above
> and,also,connect one of the waveform outputs of the
> master vco to the sync input of the slave vco.for a
> better sync sound ,the freq. of the master vco has to
> be lower than the freq. of the slave vco.(and don't
> forget to modulate the pitch of the slave vco with an
> lfo,adsr,etc.)
> i hope that helps...
> bakis.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- : : M 3 D I U M: : : Sat Nov 16 10: 12:
> 35@y...,
> UNEXPECTED_DATA_AFTER_ADDRESS_IN_GROUP@....;;;;;;;,
> ":::M 3 D I U M:::" <horn@m...> wrote:
> > I have a system with the following modules:
> > 
> > A110
> > A1102
> > 118
> > 114
> > 115
> > 116
> > 117
> > 130
> > 119 
> > 136
> > 145
> > 160
> > 161
> > 180
> > 138 (x2)
> > 171
> > 140 (x2)
> > 
> > I have a  a Clarity midi-CV Unit, I usually run one
> > channel of midi to the
> > midi-CV Unit, with a output of pair of gate/cv. 
> > Since I have 2 osc. I like
> > to fatten up the sound with the 2nd osc. Running
> > detuned a bit or an octave
> > below. If I just have one cv source plug, what is
> > the best way to sync the
> > two osc? I need an inverse mixer, should I use the
> > 180 where I can input a
> > signal and break it out to multiple outputs,  Or do
> > I work with the H-sync
> > on the 110-2? 
> > 
> > Thanks in advance.
> > 
> > Coleman.
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> =====
> synthfreak(parallel worlds)
> athens-greece
> [Doepfer_a100] group owner-moderator
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site
> http://webhosting.yahoo.com

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.