On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 22:08:31 -0000, you wrote: >1. The above mentioned site claims that the MFX3 still has full CMI functionality up untill >Rev 11. Is this correct? At other placed I read that the MFX2 was the last model that >supported CMI functionality. MFX3 is a different machine alltogether. It probably was a typo and it should have read MFX2. 11.40 machines can still be used as a normal fairlight series III. >2. Do all the MFX models, that offer the same functionality as the Series III, use the same >voice cards with the same filters? MFX2 is equal to a series III. An MFX2 usually has a router card that can connect the 16 internal voice cards to 24 outputs via software. only 16 of those outs are active at any given time simultaneously. A rev 9.34 machine can also have a router without being an MFX. >3. I understand that the MFX 2 & 3 are primarily hard disk recorder. If these units offer the >same functionality as the Series III, how is it implemented? Can you use the sampler >functions simultaneously with the HD recorder? yes. Only MFX2. >4. The MFX has a 24 voice routing card. What's the use of the 24 outputs when you've only >got 16 voice cards? Oh, you knew that already ? see above. >5. Are the HD tracks multiplexed or is it 1 voice card/track? It's probably somewhere in the manual. >6. The MFX series uses a different hardware controller. I think you are referring to the alpha keyboard with jog dial ? Yes. > They lose the pen tablet. Is it still >possible to fully use the CMI capabilities with the MFX controller? You attach a mouse. I think it should even be possible to use a series III tablet. >Or does one have to >purchase the keyboard with the tablet to fully use the CMI functions? No, you use the mouse. You might even use a pen tablet for a PC if it emulates a microsoft mouse without having to load software. >Best, >David Regards, Harald.
Message
Re: [Fairlight-CMI] Series III vs. MFX2
2006-12-18 by Harald Feldmann
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.