Yahoo Groups archive

Fairlight-CMI

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:03 UTC

Thread

Fairlight on googlevideo

Fairlight on googlevideo

2007-02-14 by Lars Johansson

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4902114777397513256&q=The+Shape+Of+Things+That+Hum&hl=en

LJ

http://medlem.spray.se/waveterm/LJLab2006/

Re: [Fairlight-CMI] Fairlight on googlevideo

2007-02-15 by donnacha costello


Nick Park et al should make a \u2018creature comforts\u2019 short from those two office journos.

On 15/02/2007 09:08, "Peter Connelly" wrote:

Show quoted textHide quoted text
Nice find :)

Don't like the way the slag it though... Grrrrr


On 2/14/07, Lars Johansson wrote:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4902114777397513256&q=The+Shape+Of+Things+That+Hum&hl=en

LJ

http://medlem.spray.se/waveterm/LJLab2006/




Re: [Fairlight-CMI] Fairlight = rare

2007-02-15 by Harald Feldmann

Very good comparison Laurent !

Also consider this: http://www.stradivariusviolins.org/antoniostradivari

Around 650 Stradivarius exist today. How many Fairlights exist today ?
Which is more rare ? ...

And what about an ARP 2500...


Regards,
Harald.


Laurent Lemaire wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> When I try to explain this to friends who are not familiar to the domain,
> I use two simple examples:
>
> - How do you fly today from Paris/London to NY in 3 hours since the
>   concorde was retired ?
> - Why people would pay a fortune for an old violin when you can buy
>   a yamaha one for 500 Euros...
>
> Well, it's because you have to admit that some old technologies were
> better. And that new one are sometime the best but it's not always
> the case... So the Airbus 380 is maybe a great product, but it will
> never replace the Concorde.

Re: [Fairlight-CMI] Fairlight on googlevideo

2007-02-15 by Laurent Lemaire

Hi Lars,

Thanks for the link !!! This TV show is really strange. I watched
the one about the Fairlight where they say the sound was crap and
mainly talk about the ridiculous "dog" sound from the first CMI.
They talk about the expensive price and technical issues... But
are very short on the positive aspects and don't talk at all about
the later models.

So I decided to watch the AKAI S1000 show to have another feeling.
Well. When you listen them it's the best invention, no issue, best
product...

So for a TV show made in 2001, I think it's rewritting a little bit
the history. They focus on certain aspect and don't give a global
view. And they go in this popular direction which is: you can buy
today (for nothing) better technology than these old dinosaurs
machines which were so expensive and always out of order...

Personaly I don't agree with this position. I believe some expensive
technologies which did exist in the 70-80s were replaced by cheaper
ones in the 90s. Or disapeared and will never exist again.

I have seen this in the computer industry when I worked with Sgi & Cray.
It's also the case for music instruments but in many other domains.

When I try to explain this to friends who are not familiar to the domain,
I use two simple examples:

- How do you fly today from Paris/London to NY in 3 hours since the
  concorde was retired ?
- Why people would pay a fortune for an old violin when you can buy
  a yamaha one for 500 Euros...

Well, it's because you have to admit that some old technologies were
better. And that new one are sometime the best but it's not always
the case... So the Airbus 380 is maybe a great product, but it will
never replace the Concorde.

But I may be wrong...

Best regards.

     Laurent.

Re: [Fairlight-CMI] Fairlight on googlevideo

2007-02-15 by Peter Connelly

They came across as quite clueless really... Silly people

On 2/15/07, Laurent Lemaire <llemaire1@free.fr> wrote:

Hi Lars,

Thanks for the link !!! This TV show is really strange. I watched
the one about the Fairlight where they say the sound was crap and
mainly talk about the ridiculous "dog" sound from the first CMI.
They talk about the expensive price and technical issues... But
are very short on the positive aspects and don't talk at all about
the later models.

So I decided to watch the AKAI S1000 show to have another feeling.
Well. When you listen them it's the best invention, no issue, best
product...

So for a TV show made in 2001, I think it's rewritting a little bit
the history. They focus on certain aspect and don't give a global
view. And they go in this popular direction which is: you can buy
today (for nothing) better technology than these old dinosaurs
machines which were so expensive and always out of order...

Personaly I don't agree with this position. I believe some expensive
technologies which did exist in the 70-80s were replaced by cheaper
ones in the 90s. Or disapeared and will never exist again.

I have seen this in the computer industry when I worked with Sgi & Cray.
It's also the case for music instruments but in many other domains.

When I try to explain this to friends who are not familiar to the domain,
I use two simple examples:

- How do you fly today from Paris/London to NY in 3 hours since the
concorde was retired ?
- Why people would pay a fortune for an old violin when you can buy
a yamaha one for 500 Euros...

Well, it's because you have to admit that some old technologies were
better. And that new one are sometime the best but it's not always
the case... So the Airbus 380 is maybe a great product, but it will
never replace the Concorde.

But I may be wrong...

Best regards.

Laurent.


Kate Bush interview Fairlight - Youtube.

2007-02-17 by Harald Feldmann

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lAuDZfkb7g

This is a lengthy documentary cut into pieces. At the end of the 4th
piece there is mention of Kate Bush discovering the Fairlight. The
link brings you to the start of section 5, the onset to The Dreaming
and Hounds of love.

Re: Fairlight on googlevideo

2007-02-17 by Tomás

Yes, the journalists were silly and tedious; and the narrator was
talking about the Roland "TB-808" drum machine, while a large clear
image of the machine spun on screen...

--- In Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Connelly"
<peter.yahoogroups@...> wrote:
>
> They came across as quite clueless really... Silly people

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.