Well, it looks to me like someone with an epson printer that has durabrite ink has to give this a go. The ink is resisting the ferric chloride for a while. Then, it starts to breakdown and the etchant starts to eat away at the copper. So, it does appear to work for a while. I certainly can read my name from the previous etch test. However, I also drew a box and some lines around my name with a sharpie. When I run my finger over the board, I can easily tell the difference in thickness of the copper. The areas that were masked with the sharpie are much thicker copper than with the ink. The problem with my tests is that I have no way to consistantly control the application thickness (Film thickness) of the ink. So, in areas where the ink is thick, it protects good - I suspect. This also appears to be the case where I tried another "Flood fill" area. Some areas resisted well, others etched through like there was nothing there. So, I really think the next step is for someone to try it on an ink jet printer. that will provide consistant thickness of ink and of course, something accurate to see after the etching. that's all I got folks. Chris
Message
Re: RE : Epson durabrite ink tests - I have ink -no printer...
2006-04-15 by lcdpublishing
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.