>I don't know >why, I used have a darkroom and develop photos and such. Possibly because you think developing PCBs is as involved as developing photos. The following, in reference to photographic method of doing PCBs, is from the Pulsar website; ================================ This has been the most common method for the serious "midnight engineer" as well as R&D divisions of larger corporations who do their own designs. This process requires a lot of support equipment. Darkroom, hot roll laminator to apply dry film (or buy expensive pre-sensitized PCB blanks), use one of several methods to make your film negative, UV exposure lamp & counter, contact print frame, trays and processing chemicals! There is a lot to it on the "setup" side. As you can see, this can be a pretty involved procedure and the system takes up quite a bit of dedicated space. It's not the fastest and it's not the cheapest method, however, results can be extremely good and it does allow for limited mass production capabilities. ================================ Trust me, the above is a long outdated approach. However, convenient to use if one is in the business of selling TT supplies. --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "lcdpublishing" <lcdpublishing@...> wrote: >
Message
Re: RE : Epson durabrite ink tests - I have ink -no printer...
2006-04-16 by derekhawkins
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.