Your right about it not stopping them. Those idiots that decided to fly some planes into the buildings 5 years ago sure didn't stop and think, gee, I don't know how to fly a plane so the plan won't work. Rather, they spent years planning and training how to do it, then executed the plan. Stopping the sale of "Pilot Training" to law abiding people wouldn't have stopped them from their goals. GRRRRRRRRRRRr, it's frustrating! --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Stefan Trethan" <stefan_trethan@...> wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:26:16 +0200, lcdpublishing > <lcdpublishing@...> wrote: > > > > > For some reason, I just can't believe that someone who is willing to > > strap bombs on themselves and is willing to blow themselves up in > > the name of (insert cause here) is actually going to be detered by > > breaking a law that limits the sale of some such product. If these > > people have no value for life, including their own, breaking a > > simple law sure as heck isn't a deterant! > > > The thought is the stuff should be harder to get. Nobody cares about > breaking the law, but if you can't just go to the next store and buy > whatever you need for your bomb it is that tiny little bit harder to make > it. > Of course i agree it is a totally ineffective measure because someone > prepared to blow himself up will find a (only slightly more complicated) > way to get what he needs. So breaking the law is not meant to be the > barrier, lack of availability is. > > Gouvernments need to be seen doing something, looking at how things only > get worse and worse. That's just one more stupid experiment that luckily > is only annoying, not outright dangerous like some of the things they are > doing. > > ST >
Message
Re: Chemicals and prototyping (was: Removing ferric chloride stains)
2006-10-12 by lcdpublishing
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.