> I'm glad to see that preheating the board is working for others. So maybe a heating element under > the board to minimize heat lose before printing? My infeed table is aluminum so I could heat it > fairly easy. I had problems with the Epson ink coming off in the etch until I made sure the board > was VERY clean. If I cleaned the ink off the board before etching you could see where the ink > actually made the copper cleaner in the trace areas. Unless the Epson ink does a better job I will > get away form it as it's too much moola. So keep it up with the MSI testing. > Yes preheating makes a big difference. I have not given up on the Epson Magenta yet. I really liked the way it looked after it was applied very clean and even density. I think it applied better than the MISPRO Yellow. And yes you make a good point board condition is very important. I am not sure that I am getting the board clean enough. I sand with 600 emery, wet then wipe with 90% Isopropyl Alcohol. I think next time I will try an Acetone wipe. Also one of the things I had been doing before you found the preheat solution was to use a surfactant to help disperse the ink. I was still using this yesterday as a comparison to the preheat method. Bottom line I am not sure that the boards were fully cleaned of any remaining surfactant. I will make some more tests hopefully in the next few days. Lots to do! Would be nice to see some pix of your conversion, particularly the feed system. I have not come up with a satisfactory feed system yet.. John
Message
Re: C88 direct inkjet printing
2007-02-07 by jam5411
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.