Andrew wrote: > > > Does the Epson peizo print head have less > scatter of dots than the Canon Adam uses ? > Your photos of the 6/6 artwork certainly > look less jaggy than Adams. Unfortunately all inkjet printers seem to suffer the same problem. Since its invisible to the naked eye , printer manufactures are unlikely to bother improving it. All that is needed is to slow the print head by 10 times. You may wait 5 minutes for a printout, but who cares ? I can't think of any applications other than for hobby PCBs. Professional screen printers who use inkjet printer transparencies for photomasks don't even need that accuracy and any PCB manufacture will use a laser photoplotter (3000+ dpi). So the marketers of inkjet printer manufactures aren't going to get any calls from customers demanding reduced line edge jaggedness. If your interested, I can send you similar images produced from an Epson Stylus 660 printer. > In my case the bubble etcher will fully > etch a stripe down one side of a board in > 1/2 the time it takes the middle of the > board to etch. > This agrees with my experience with bubble etching too. For really fine lines, such large etch non-uniformity is unacceptable. Another thing to note is Derek's test pieces had 6 mil spacing between 6 mil lines. I bet if one of those 6 mil lines were far away from surrounding copper then it will get etched faster, and therefore more undercut. Adam
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: printer limitations or etch undercut
2007-04-11 by Adam Seychell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.