Adam Seychell wrote: > Andrew wrote: >> >> Does the Epson peizo print head have less >> scatter of dots than the Canon Adam uses ? >> Your photos of the 6/6 artwork certainly >> look less jaggy than Adams. > > Unfortunately all inkjet printers seem to suffer the same problem. Since > its invisible to the naked eye , printer manufactures are unlikely to > bother improving it. All that is needed is to slow the print head by 10 > times. You may wait 5 minutes for a printout, but who cares ? I can't > think of any applications other than for hobby PCBs. Professional screen > printers who use inkjet printer transparencies for photomasks don't even > need that accuracy and any PCB manufacture will use a laser photoplotter > (3000+ dpi). So the marketers of inkjet printer manufactures aren't > going to get any calls from customers demanding reduced line edge > jaggedness. > > If your interested, I can send you similar images produced from an Epson > Stylus 660 printer. > >> In my case the bubble etcher will fully >> etch a stripe down one side of a board in >> 1/2 the time it takes the middle of the >> board to etch. >> > > This agrees with my experience with bubble etching too. For really fine > lines, such large etch non-uniformity is unacceptable. Another thing to > note is Derek's test pieces had 6 mil spacing between 6 mil lines. I bet > if one of those 6 mil lines were far away from surrounding copper then > it will get etched faster, and therefore more undercut. Using a Stylus 460 printer driver on linux (CUPS printing), i've got it on a mode where a 50mm long pcb will take atleast 10 mins to print. The resolution is very high.
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: printer limitations or etch undercut
2007-04-11 by Russell Shaw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.