JPG is quite poor at rendering images with sharp edges, so I would stick with GIF or PNG. The JPG compression algorithm leaves what I think of as "visual echoes" or ripples in the image. These are invisible in photographs, but stand out with a vengeance in high contrast images with sharp edges. Please note that I am very colour blind and see things differently. I have many times experienced poor monitor quality (where I see obvious image artifacts) that others don't have any problem with. BMP is a an uncompressed format (i.e. bloated) and proprietary to M$, though many programs can display such images. Donald. trevwhite74 wrote: > --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Steve" <alienrelics@...> wrote: >> I'm sure the 0% part is a temporary bug. >> >> It isn't as much the size of a BMP as it is the potential difficulty in viewing them from a browser. JPG, PNG, and GIF are viewable directly from the browser, where formats like BMP and TIF may require either an external viewer or extra plug-ins. >> >> Steve Greenfield >> > > Did not realise that about BMP. That is a note for the future. Thanks. Have now added some proper desriptions. Thanks. > > Hopefully people can view them now and actually now what I am talking about. 8\ufffd) > >
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Toner Print quality
2009-03-14 by Donald H Locker
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.