> > Hello all, > > Like many of you, I've had great success with the Direct toner > > method. Unless I'm mistaken I was the FIRST to suggest the use of > > sheets from magazines as a souce of the paper ( I did EXTENSIVE > > research on the net for a couple of months looking for > > > But, again, remember that you guys had a reason that made you believe > you needed to GET a laminator. You were clearly not getting the results > Thats right, I needed to get consistancy to get anywhere near the resolution I'm getting now with the laminator. I tried a few years ago to make several different papers work with a clothes iron (dynart, transparencies, sticker backer board, gelatin coated papers, elmers glue coated paper, inkjet photo paper, and yes even magazine paper --all at suggestions from other people on other usegroups at the time) with limited success. I could do small boards with fairly coarse resolutions, but I finally went back to the tried and true photoresist method. I like many people wasen't willing to stick with it for just something that I could only successfully build smt adaper and carrier boards. Obviously other people where getting better results but I couldn't reproduce them. The laminator got me to revisit the method when I didn't have coated boards handy and to my pleasant suprise it worked great. The laminator limited the amount of technique required to get the toner transfer to work (for me). I was able to produce very complex boards with it. If you get it right, you don't need to do *any* touchup. The laminator may be a crutch, but it can simplify your life greatly. YMMV, but the laminator worked better for me. You can get them new from $29 on up (the Royal Sovereign I use is ~$70; so to me its a no brainer. Others will disagree. That said, I think the clothes iron video would be a great idea. Many people don't have access or the funds to use a paper laminator. It's always handy to see what works for other people.
Message
Re: Model of laminator used
2003-10-29 by wheedal99
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.