On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 16:35:04 -0500, you wrote: >No, but it isn't that expensive, either. Another (free) alternative, >as has been mentioned before is Linux and linuxcnc. You would have to >become familiar with Linux if you haven't used it (I haven't), but it >should be pretty easy if you are only using it for one program. > >I just ordered a 3 axis controller on ebay ($42 USD including >shipping), though I think I could use the parts from the on-board >controller to make my own controller, especially if I use the parallel port. As a note culled from the CAD/CAM group. Please be aware that the chip/chipset used in the boards can be a limiting factor. Some chips cannot be pushed all that close to their limits. Almost all (if not every one) of the chips/chipsets do NOT tolerate removing the load (stepper) from the chip with power on. It generally blows the output in the chip (requiring either replacement of the entire chip or the driver for that channel, if separate). You need to be aware that connectors used to run the board to the stepper need to be as robust (read: lock in place) as possible, and the wires need to be reasonably flexible (wiring from the connection to the stepper will flex, so you don't want that to break). That said, I think, (without any kind of data to the contrary), that these boards will work well within their limits (NO overvoltage, NO overcurrent, NO disconnects). The only boards/drivers that I know about that are as rugged as possible are made by gecko, and are the V series (vampire.... Mariss has a sense of humor). Even then, the warranty is outstanding. What I use (because I'm thoroughly cheap and had the chips) is an L297/L298 chipset with jumper settings for parameters and optical isolators for step and direction. I haven't blown any of them, *but* I have been very careful with what I've been doing. Roughly 35 volts and about 2.5 amps maximum, no behavior compensation, so not the best in the design. I'm doing a parallel port if I mess with a controlling PC, a custom program (to be written) using an XMEGA otherwise, and for a full blown solution, an FPGA hardware pulse generator (it works, but I need to see how good it is, implemented in the simulator). Harvey > >Mark >
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Vinyl Cutter Conversion
2013-03-03 by Harvey White
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.