Perhaps someone with some knowledge on public works and sewage treatment can clarify this for me. I guess it must be the copper in the ferric chloride etchant that we dispose of that is the problem - is that correct? Is there actually copper per se any more after the reaction of etching? I'm pretty sure somewhere in the sewage treatment process, after gross solids are removed, the water in the sewage system is sent to settling ponds. While in the ponds ferric chloride is added to act as a flocculent i.e. an agent that causes solids to gather together in clumps for easy removal. If this is the case, would it make any difference if there were some ferric chloride in the system to begin with (from flushing etchant down the drain)? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: trying to do the right thing
2013-03-10 by Dave Sage
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.