in my opinon the preasence of ferric is not the issue. It is tje heavy metals that is the peoblem. On Mar 10, 2013 1:03 PM, "Dave Sage" <davesage12@rogers.com> wrote: > ** > > > Perhaps someone with some knowledge on public works and sewage treatment > can > clarify this for me. > > I guess it must be the copper in the ferric chloride etchant that we > dispose > of that is the problem - is that correct? Is there actually copper per se > any more after the reaction of etching? > > I'm pretty sure somewhere in the sewage treatment process, after gross > solids are removed, the water in the sewage system is sent to settling > ponds. While in the ponds ferric chloride is added to act as a flocculent > i.e. an agent that causes solids to gather together in clumps for easy > removal. If this is the case, would it make any difference if there were > some ferric chloride in the system to begin with (from flushing etchant > down > the drain)? > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: trying to do the right thing
2013-03-10 by Charlie Taylor
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.