On 27 Jul 2014 17:01:43 -0700, you wrote: >I was wondering how many of you folks use fillets in your PCB patterns where two traces, or any two edges for that matter, meet at 90 degrees. I almost always bevel at 45 degrees. I rather wish that Eagle had a "constrain to 45 degrees by moving both ends" behavior as an option. > >I was looking at some commercially produced patterns and they seem to frequently employ fillets. This is I presume to prevent cutting in of the pattern at 90 degree corners when the board is etched. For a pattern produced on a computer it's easy enough to add them in. Would it make any difference if one is using the toner transfer method? > I was told many years ago that traces had a tendency to break if they were at 90 degrees (that was the expression they used). In theory, I can imagine that etching through at the 90 degree junction may be a problem. As such, I will avoid 90 degree joints (even T joints) and bevel at 45 degrees. I suspect that it was a result of etching (and etching *in* at the 90 degrees inside point), since they used photoetching (KPR) and had production etching capability in house. Therefore, the toner transfer method would not make a difference, one way or another. (or so says logic and my memory). Harvey >Thanks in advance for your comments. > >John
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] To fillet or not to fillet on a PCB pattern
2014-07-28 by Harvey White
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.