The real issue for me is the availability of libraries though I agree that schematic capture/edit is a deal breaker. I kind of just assume that any reasonable system will have a decent one. I like eagle because there are a lot of libraries free for the using and the lib editor is reasonably capable (though cumbersome to use). If I were trying to push a new system, I'd have a gazillion libraries out there to make it trivially easy to get going. Also, I'd have a bunch of predefined symbols (packages, schematic symbols) that I could use to quickly add a new part. There is nothing more discouraging than to start a design and discover that you need to create all sorts of new parts completely from scratch. A 15 minute job becomes hours of tedium in looking up layouts and so on. Actually, if it were me, I'd figure out to import other systems libraries. heh heh.... --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Russell Shaw <rjshaw@n...> wrote: > Stefan Trethan wrote: > >>Anything that's not open source is not yours whatever you pay. If the > >>vendor disappears, you're on borrowed time. > >> > > Any open sorce pcb software out there? > > "pcb" for linux. I haven't used it, because there's no matching > schematic editor i like.
Message
Re: New electronic design and layout software
2004-03-12 by Phil
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.