Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Digest Number 2406
2008-02-16 by Donald H Locker
I hope someone is experimenting with hexagonal placement of the UV LEDs. A square pattern is guaranteed to have the greatest non-uniformity for the number of LEDs used. Donald. Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com wrote: > There are 17 messages in this issue. [snip] > 1d. Re: buying LED's for a exposure box > Posted by: "Adam Seychell" a_seychell@... a_seychell > Date: Thu Feb 14, 2008 2:43 pm ((PST)) > > Markus Zingg wrote: >> >> Adam, >> >> I do have a 20mm grid spacing, and I'm so far satisfied. Even though it >> never formed a problem of any kind, one can SEE the grid on the >> resulting exposed laminate. It's seen like kind of darker and lighter >> circular shaped areas on the exposed resist. Again, developping the >> result always worked excellent with no irritations in the result whatsoever. > > That's good to hear it works despite the visible pattern. What is your > space between the LED and PCB ? I guess the larger the distance the > greater the light overlap of adjacent LED's and possibly better uniformity. > >> At the very surprisingly low prices of these LEDs, I would consider >> using an even more narrow grid. My box (kingbright leds, with what I >> understand only 160mcd typical) result in a one minute exposure time. > > The BestHongKong ebay seller Tom pointed out had the better specs > (tighter spectrum tolerance, polar plot). Interestingly , some LEDs are > rated in mcd while others rated in mW. BestHongKong 5mm UV LED's are all > 11mW 20 degree. I think I'll get these. But might also get $11 ones from > Winsome House Store just for fun. > > >.... I would spend the time to build a complete exposure unit to make >> sure they work. > > For sure. Some preliminary testing will soon give me estimate of > exposure times vs grid spacing and test non-uniformity. > > I'll be sure to let others know how it goes. > > Adam Seychell [snip]