Yahoo Groups archive

Homebrew PCBs

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:05 UTC

Thread

Speed control for laminator motor

Speed control for laminator motor

2010-04-29 by Richard Spelling

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Went to bed tired and annoyed I couldn't easily find a slower gear motor
for the laminator.

Dreamed about building a magical speed controller that would let me run
the existing motor infinitely slow.

Realized I could use "temporal kinetic and thermal stabilization" since
it's a worm gear motor.

I.E., I build a standard PWM controller but set the frequency real
sloowwwwww.

Imagine having the speed turned down real low. Along comes a pulse. The
motor spins up and turns the worm screw a revolution or two, then spins
down. The board advances a fraction of an inch. An in-determinant amount
of time later, along comes another pulse.

Yes, it's "jogging" the board forward and not continuous motion, but
between jogs it sits between the rollers long enough for the heat to
transfer through the paper.

I'm thinking about 10Hz.

Whatcha think? Just another crazy idear from Richard?

Now I just need to build the board.

Wait a second, I need my laminator to build the board to fix the laminator!


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkvZmXgACgkQ7R3zOzCoP9TDTwCgif7mfECp/31+fYq2RX/lkLca
rcgAnjxf1FYgfzIrYMy3PBHKB2I1CcW6
=z+Py
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: Speed control for laminator motor

2010-04-29 by alienrelics

Sounds like a perfect place for a stepper motor.

Steve Greenfield

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Richard Spelling <rls@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Went to bed tired and annoyed I couldn't easily find a slower gear motor
> for the laminator.
> 
> Dreamed about building a magical speed controller that would let me run
> the existing motor infinitely slow.
> 
> Realized I could use "temporal kinetic and thermal stabilization" since
> it's a worm gear motor.
> 
> I.E., I build a standard PWM controller but set the frequency real
> sloowwwwww.
> 
> Imagine having the speed turned down real low. Along comes a pulse. The
> motor spins up and turns the worm screw a revolution or two, then spins
> down. The board advances a fraction of an inch. An in-determinant amount
> of time later, along comes another pulse.
> 
> Yes, it's "jogging" the board forward and not continuous motion, but
> between jogs it sits between the rollers long enough for the heat to
> transfer through the paper.
> 
> I'm thinking about 10Hz.
> 
> Whatcha think? Just another crazy idear from Richard?
> 
> Now I just need to build the board.
> 
> Wait a second, I need my laminator to build the board to fix the laminator!
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAkvZmXgACgkQ7R3zOzCoP9TDTwCgif7mfECp/31+fYq2RX/lkLca
> rcgAnjxf1FYgfzIrYMy3PBHKB2I1CcW6
> =z+Py
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Speed control for laminator motor

2010-04-29 by Andrew Villeneuve

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Richard Spelling
<rls@...>wrote:

>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Went to bed tired and annoyed I couldn't easily find a slower gear motor
> for the laminator.
>
> Dreamed about building a magical speed controller that would let me run
> the existing motor infinitely slow.
>
> Realized I could use "temporal kinetic and thermal stabilization" since
> it's a worm gear motor.
>
> I.E., I build a standard PWM controller but set the frequency real
> sloowwwwww.
>
> Imagine having the speed turned down real low. Along comes a pulse. The
> motor spins up and turns the worm screw a revolution or two, then spins
> down. The board advances a fraction of an inch. An in-determinant amount
> of time later, along comes another pulse.
>
> Yes, it's "jogging" the board forward and not continuous motion, but
> between jogs it sits between the rollers long enough for the heat to
> transfer through the paper.
>
> I'm thinking about 10Hz.
>
> Whatcha think? Just another crazy idear from Richard?
>
> Now I just need to build the board.
>
> Wait a second, I need my laminator to build the board to fix the
> laminator!
>
Richard,

PWM control of motors works very well - with a reasonable pulse frequency,
you're for all effective purposes implementing a steady, consistent slow
pace.

I've had good luck driving simple DC motors at extremely low speeds (10-20
seconds per revolution) by connecting the PWM outputs of my Arduino (AVR
microcontroller) to the motor via an SN754410NE compatible H-bridge driver.
Since you don't need to do reversal, your implementation should be even
simpler.

The Arduino uses a fixed 490Hz PWM frequency, with a variable duty cycle.  I
haven't done any experimentation with different frequencies.

-Andrew


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Speed control for laminator motor

2010-04-29 by Slavko Kocjancic

The speed controll is not right idea.
They doesn't help. Even worse.

When I put PCB in laminator I need aprox 6 times to repeat this to PCB 
get hot enought.
If you observe laminator the roller inside does not have heater. The 
roller is heated by heater mounted by side of roller. So if we slow down 
the motor then roller will cool down quick as the rubber has smal 
thermal capacity. And the PCB radiate heat quick as it has big surface. 
So the beter way is to speed up that motor and make more passes. .. but 
I just live with original motor and speed 6 pass and modification in 
temperature regulation (180 centigrades) it's just work.
If we want single pass work then the only way (with laminator) is to 
preheat board.

Slavko.

Re: Speed control for laminator motor

2010-04-30 by christiansen_alex@hotmail.com

hi
I can see from the last mail,that you could have had a sound sleep and make the group get the answer :)
anyway.. your question on doing so to make it run very slow ..
Once I made a x-t writer , it used among other things a cassette deck to move the paper with the pinch roller..and I needed times as 10 mm /hour.so I gave the motor so small pulses that it turned less than 1 revolution .. here was the belt also a problem..but if I turn it on now, I'm sure it works.
This was ,I think it was made with a 555 and a driver transistor. 
So you search for this circuit and then try it.
alex

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Richard Spelling <rls@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Went to bed tired and annoyed I couldn't easily find a slower gear motor
> for the laminator.
> 
> Dreamed about building a magical speed controller that would let me run
> the existing motor infinitely slow.
> 
> Realized I could use "temporal kinetic and thermal stabilization" since
> it's a worm gear motor.
> 
> I.E., I build a standard PWM controller but set the frequency real
> sloowwwwww.
> 
> Imagine having the speed turned down real low. Along comes a pulse. The
> motor spins up and turns the worm screw a revolution or two, then spins
> down. The board advances a fraction of an inch. An in-determinant amount
> of time later, along comes another pulse.
> 
> Yes, it's "jogging" the board forward and not continuous motion, but
> between jogs it sits between the rollers long enough for the heat to
> transfer through the paper.
> 
> I'm thinking about 10Hz.
> 
> Whatcha think? Just another crazy idear from Richard?
> 
> Now I just need to build the board.
> 
> Wait a second, I need my laminator to build the board to fix the laminator!
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAkvZmXgACgkQ7R3zOzCoP9TDTwCgif7mfECp/31+fYq2RX/lkLca
> rcgAnjxf1FYgfzIrYMy3PBHKB2I1CcW6
> =z+Py
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

Re: Speed control for laminator motor

2010-04-30 by awakephd

Richard, what kind of circuit do you have in mind for the PWM? If you're wanting to do something with discrete ICs rather than a microprocessor, I put together a PWM controller that allows for variable frequency as well as variable pulse width (true PWM) -- and it only requires 2 op-amps or comparators, so it can be made with a single chip (not counting the drive circuitry). This may be a common design -- I may have re-invented the wheel! -- but I couldn't find anything like this when I was needing this circuit. I specifically wanted something that generated true PWM, but allowed me to vary the frequency so that I could choose the best frequency at which to run for a given application. Let me know if you're interested.

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Richard Spelling <rls@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Went to bed tired and annoyed I couldn't easily find a slower gear motor
> for the laminator.
> 
> Dreamed about building a magical speed controller that would let me run
> the existing motor infinitely slow.
> 
> Realized I could use "temporal kinetic and thermal stabilization" since
> it's a worm gear motor.
> 
> I.E., I build a standard PWM controller but set the frequency real
> sloowwwwww.
> 
> Imagine having the speed turned down real low. Along comes a pulse. The
> motor spins up and turns the worm screw a revolution or two, then spins
> down. The board advances a fraction of an inch. An in-determinant amount
> of time later, along comes another pulse.
> 
> Yes, it's "jogging" the board forward and not continuous motion, but
> between jogs it sits between the rollers long enough for the heat to
> transfer through the paper.
> 
> I'm thinking about 10Hz.
> 
> Whatcha think? Just another crazy idear from Richard?
> 
> Now I just need to build the board.
> 
> Wait a second, I need my laminator to build the board to fix the laminator!
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAkvZmXgACgkQ7R3zOzCoP9TDTwCgif7mfECp/31+fYq2RX/lkLca
> rcgAnjxf1FYgfzIrYMy3PBHKB2I1CcW6
> =z+Py
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

Re: Speed control for laminator motor

2010-04-30 by awakephd

Slavko, my experience suggests a different understanding of what is happening. In the laminator that I am using, the heat is applied between two plates; the rollers are on either side of these plates. Moving the board more slowly allows the board to get hotter before it encounters the pressure from the rollers. IOW, the rollers are not supplying any heat, only pressure.

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Slavko Kocjancic <eslavko@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> The speed controll is not right idea.
> They doesn't help. Even worse.
> 
> When I put PCB in laminator I need aprox 6 times to repeat this to PCB 
> get hot enought.
> If you observe laminator the roller inside does not have heater. The 
> roller is heated by heater mounted by side of roller. So if we slow down 
> the motor then roller will cool down quick as the rubber has smal 
> thermal capacity. And the PCB radiate heat quick as it has big surface. 
> So the beter way is to speed up that motor and make more passes. .. but 
> I just live with original motor and speed 6 pass and modification in 
> temperature regulation (180 centigrades) it's just work.
> If we want single pass work then the only way (with laminator) is to 
> preheat board.
> 
> Slavko.
>

Re: Speed control for laminator motor

2010-04-30 by rlspell2000

Yeah, I decided to forgo the speed control and reinstalled the motor. I can always add it later. BTW, my laminator has heaters inside both of the heated rollers.

I pre-heat under an iron already to make the paper stick before I trim the excess off. I usually put it in the laminator at 100C.

It will be only a small change in procedure to preheat up to say 150C, then run it through the laminator (with the rollers set maybe 40C cooler than I was running them, maybe 180C)

I will report progess and temps when I get the parts in and the laminator repaired.

Interestingly, I thought the laminator heaters would be halogen lights like the laser printer I disassembled. Instead they are regular nicrome wire coils held in some kind of clear tube. I suspect quarts.


--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Slavko Kocjancic <eslavko@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> The speed controll is not right idea.
> They doesn't help. Even worse.
> 
> When I put PCB in laminator I need aprox 6 times to repeat this to PCB 
> get hot enought.
> If you observe laminator the roller inside does not have heater. The 
> roller is heated by heater mounted by side of roller. So if we slow down 
> the motor then roller will cool down quick as the rubber has smal 
> thermal capacity. And the PCB radiate heat quick as it has big surface. 
> So the beter way is to speed up that motor and make more passes. .. but 
> I just live with original motor and speed 6 pass and modification in 
> temperature regulation (180 centigrades) it's just work.
> If we want single pass work then the only way (with laminator) is to 
> preheat board.
> 
> Slavko.
>

Re: Speed control for laminator motor

2010-05-01 by alienrelics

I think it is going to depend on the laminator.

My wife has a large 18 inch wide laminator that uses rolls of plastic. It has heaters inside the rollers themselves. Probably not common in smaller laminators.

Naturally I can't modify her laminator, she won't let me. ;')  But, I found another one (a newer model, as it turns out) at a thrift store for next to nothing.

Steve Greenfield

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "awakephd" <a_wake@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Slavko, my experience suggests a different understanding of what is happening. In the laminator that I am using, the heat is applied between two plates; the rollers are on either side of these plates. Moving the board more slowly allows the board to get hotter before it encounters the pressure from the rollers. IOW, the rollers are not supplying any heat, only pressure.
> 
> --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Slavko Kocjancic <eslavko@> wrote:
> >
> > The speed controll is not right idea.
> > They doesn't help. Even worse.
> > 
> > When I put PCB in laminator I need aprox 6 times to repeat this to PCB 
> > get hot enought.
> > If you observe laminator the roller inside does not have heater. The 
> > roller is heated by heater mounted by side of roller. So if we slow down 
> > the motor then roller will cool down quick as the rubber has smal 
> > thermal capacity. And the PCB radiate heat quick as it has big surface. 
> > So the beter way is to speed up that motor and make more passes. .. but 
> > I just live with original motor and speed 6 pass and modification in 
> > temperature regulation (180 centigrades) it's just work.
> > If we want single pass work then the only way (with laminator) is to 
> > preheat board.
> > 
> > Slavko.
> >
>

Re: Speed control for laminator motor

2010-05-01 by rlspell2000

I you an op amp, some circuit I found on the 'Net. Seems to work pretty good, but doesn't have variable frequency. I would be interested in seeing your circuit.

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "awakephd" <a_wake@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Richard, what kind of circuit do you have in mind for the PWM? If you're wanting to do something with discrete ICs rather than a microprocessor, I put together a PWM controller that allows for variable frequency as well as variable pulse width (true PWM) -- and it only requires 2 op-amps or comparators, so it can be made with a single chip (not counting the drive circuitry). This may be a common design -- I may have re-invented the wheel! -- but I couldn't find anything like this when I was needing this circuit. I specifically wanted something that generated true PWM, but allowed me to vary the frequency so that I could choose the best frequency at which to run for a given application. Let me know if you're interested.
> 
> --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Richard Spelling <rls@> wrote:
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > Went to bed tired and annoyed I couldn't easily find a slower gear motor
> > for the laminator.
> > 
> > Dreamed about building a magical speed controller that would let me run
> > the existing motor infinitely slow.
> > 
> > Realized I could use "temporal kinetic and thermal stabilization" since
> > it's a worm gear motor.
> > 
> > I.E., I build a standard PWM controller but set the frequency real
> > sloowwwwww.
> > 
> > Imagine having the speed turned down real low. Along comes a pulse. The
> > motor spins up and turns the worm screw a revolution or two, then spins
> > down. The board advances a fraction of an inch. An in-determinant amount
> > of time later, along comes another pulse.
> > 
> > Yes, it's "jogging" the board forward and not continuous motion, but
> > between jogs it sits between the rollers long enough for the heat to
> > transfer through the paper.
> > 
> > I'm thinking about 10Hz.
> > 
> > Whatcha think? Just another crazy idear from Richard?
> > 
> > Now I just need to build the board.
> > 
> > Wait a second, I need my laminator to build the board to fix the laminator!
> > 
> > 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> > 
> > iEYEARECAAYFAkvZmXgACgkQ7R3zOzCoP9TDTwCgif7mfECp/31+fYq2RX/lkLca
> > rcgAnjxf1FYgfzIrYMy3PBHKB2I1CcW6
> > =z+Py
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
>

RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Speed control for laminator motor

2010-05-01 by Roger Blair

I am interested in this also, if you don't mind sharing.

Thanks,

Roger
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of awakephd
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 07:38
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Speed control for laminator motor

 

  

Richard, what kind of circuit do you have in mind for the PWM? If you're wanting to do something with discrete ICs rather than a
microprocessor, I put together a PWM controller that allows for variable frequency as well as variable pulse width (true PWM) -- and
it only requires 2 op-amps or comparators, so it can be made with a single chip (not counting the drive circuitry). This may be a
common design -- I may have re-invented the wheel! -- but I couldn't find anything like this when I was needing this circuit. I
specifically wanted something that generated true PWM, but allowed me to vary the frequency so that I could choose the best
frequency at which to run for a given application. Let me know if you're interested.

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Homebrew_PCBs%40yahoogroups.com> , Richard Spelling <rls@...> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Went to bed tired and annoyed I couldn't easily find a slower gear motor
> for the laminator.
> 
> Dreamed about building a magical speed controller that would let me run
> the existing motor infinitely slow.
> 
> Realized I could use "temporal kinetic and thermal stabilization" since
> it's a worm gear motor.
> 
> I.E., I build a standard PWM controller but set the frequency real
> sloowwwwww.
> 
> Imagine having the speed turned down real low. Along comes a pulse. The
> motor spins up and turns the worm screw a revolution or two, then spins
> down. The board advances a fraction of an inch. An in-determinant amount
> of time later, along comes another pulse.
> 
> Yes, it's "jogging" the board forward and not continuous motion, but
> between jogs it sits between the rollers long enough for the heat to
> transfer through the paper.
> 
> I'm thinking about 10Hz.
> 
> Whatcha think? Just another crazy idear from Richard?
> 
> Now I just need to build the board.
> 
> Wait a second, I need my laminator to build the board to fix the laminator!
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAkvZmXgACgkQ7R3zOzCoP9TDTwCgif7mfECp/31+fYq2RX/lkLca
> rcgAnjxf1FYgfzIrYMy3PBHKB2I1CcW6
> =z+Py
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Speed control for laminator motor

2010-05-01 by casy_ch@tbwil.ch

It would be nice if you could put it into the file or photo section of the group. Thank you.

Jean-Claude, Switzerland
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Roger Blair 
  To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 5:36 PM
  Subject: RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Speed control for laminator motor


    
  I am interested in this also, if you don't mind sharing.

  Thanks,

  Roger

  From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of awakephd
  Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 07:38
  To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Speed control for laminator motor

  Richard, what kind of circuit do you have in mind for the PWM? If you're wanting to do something with discrete ICs rather than a
  microprocessor, I put together a PWM controller that allows for variable frequency as well as variable pulse width (true PWM) -- and
  it only requires 2 op-amps or comparators, so it can be made with a single chip (not counting the drive circuitry). This may be a
  common design -- I may have re-invented the wheel! -- but I couldn't find anything like this when I was needing this circuit. I
  specifically wanted something that generated true PWM, but allowed me to vary the frequency so that I could choose the best
  frequency at which to run for a given application. Let me know if you're interested.

  --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Homebrew_PCBs%40yahoogroups.com> , Richard Spelling <rls@...> wrote:
  >
  > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
  > Hash: SHA1
  > 
  > Went to bed tired and annoyed I couldn't easily find a slower gear motor
  > for the laminator.
  > 
  > Dreamed about building a magical speed controller that would let me run
  > the existing motor infinitely slow.
  > 
  > Realized I could use "temporal kinetic and thermal stabilization" since
  > it's a worm gear motor.
  > 
  > I.E., I build a standard PWM controller but set the frequency real
  > sloowwwwww.
  > 
  > Imagine having the speed turned down real low. Along comes a pulse. The
  > motor spins up and turns the worm screw a revolution or two, then spins
  > down. The board advances a fraction of an inch. An in-determinant amount
  > of time later, along comes another pulse.
  > 
  > Yes, it's "jogging" the board forward and not continuous motion, but
  > between jogs it sits between the rollers long enough for the heat to
  > transfer through the paper.
  > 
  > I'm thinking about 10Hz.
  > 
  > Whatcha think? Just another crazy idear from Richard?
  > 
  > Now I just need to build the board.
  > 
  > Wait a second, I need my laminator to build the board to fix the laminator!
  > 
  > 
  > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
  > Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
  > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
  > 
  > iEYEARECAAYFAkvZmXgACgkQ7R3zOzCoP9TDTwCgif7mfECp/31+fYq2RX/lkLca
  > rcgAnjxf1FYgfzIrYMy3PBHKB2I1CcW6
  > =z+Py
  > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
  >

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Speed control for laminator motor

2010-05-02 by awakephd

Okay, I have uploaded a file named SingleChipPWM.pdf to the Files section. It has the schematic and a brief explanation of the circuit. I have built the circuit as shown, using 2 op-amps from an LM324 quad op-amp IC and a 12 volt single-polarity power supply. I have also built essentially the same circuit using 2 comparators from an LM339 quad comparator IC, using both 5 volt and 12 volt single-polarity voltage supplies, but with the addition of pull-up resistors, since the LM339 uses open-collector outputs.

Theoretically the circuit should work at a wide variety of voltages without altering the frequency or PWM set by the potentiometers (RV1 and RV2, respectively). I would presume it could be built with a dual op-amp chip just as well, and using split-polarity power supplies.

I'm guessing that Steve will encourage us to take further discussion of this over to Electronics_101, since this is more about circuit design than about PCB production ... :)

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, <casy_ch@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> It would be nice if you could put it into the file or photo section of the group. Thank you.
> 
> Jean-Claude, Switzerland
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Roger Blair 
>   To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com 
>   Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 5:36 PM
>   Subject: RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Speed control for laminator motor
> 
> 
>     
>   I am interested in this also, if you don't mind sharing.
> 
>   Thanks,
> 
>   Roger
> 
>   From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of awakephd
>   Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 07:38
>   To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
>   Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Speed control for laminator motor
> 
>   Richard, what kind of circuit do you have in mind for the PWM? If you're wanting to do something with discrete ICs rather than a
>   microprocessor, I put together a PWM controller that allows for variable frequency as well as variable pulse width (true PWM) -- and
>   it only requires 2 op-amps or comparators, so it can be made with a single chip (not counting the drive circuitry). This may be a
>   common design -- I may have re-invented the wheel! -- but I couldn't find anything like this when I was needing this circuit. I
>   specifically wanted something that generated true PWM, but allowed me to vary the frequency so that I could choose the best
>   frequency at which to run for a given application. Let me know if you're interested.
> 
>   --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Homebrew_PCBs%40yahoogroups.com> , Richard Spelling <rls@> wrote:
>   >
>   > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>   > Hash: SHA1
>   > 
>   > Went to bed tired and annoyed I couldn't easily find a slower gear motor
>   > for the laminator.
>   > 
>   > Dreamed about building a magical speed controller that would let me run
>   > the existing motor infinitely slow.
>   > 
>   > Realized I could use "temporal kinetic and thermal stabilization" since
>   > it's a worm gear motor.
>   > 
>   > I.E., I build a standard PWM controller but set the frequency real
>   > sloowwwwww.
>   > 
>   > Imagine having the speed turned down real low. Along comes a pulse. The
>   > motor spins up and turns the worm screw a revolution or two, then spins
>   > down. The board advances a fraction of an inch. An in-determinant amount
>   > of time later, along comes another pulse.
>   > 
>   > Yes, it's "jogging" the board forward and not continuous motion, but
>   > between jogs it sits between the rollers long enough for the heat to
>   > transfer through the paper.
>   > 
>   > I'm thinking about 10Hz.
>   > 
>   > Whatcha think? Just another crazy idear from Richard?
>   > 
>   > Now I just need to build the board.
>   > 
>   > Wait a second, I need my laminator to build the board to fix the laminator!
>   > 
>   > 
>   > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>   > Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
>   > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>   > 
>   > iEYEARECAAYFAkvZmXgACgkQ7R3zOzCoP9TDTwCgif7mfECp/31+fYq2RX/lkLca
>   > rcgAnjxf1FYgfzIrYMy3PBHKB2I1CcW6
>   > =z+Py
>   > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>   >
> 
>   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Speed control for laminator motor

2010-05-02 by Slavko Kocjancic

awakephd pravi:
>  
>
> Slavko, my experience suggests a different understanding of what is 
> happening. In the laminator that I am using, the heat is applied 
> between two plates; the rollers are on either side of these plates. 
> Moving the board more slowly allows the board to get hotter before it 
> encounters the pressure from the rollers. IOW, the rollers are not 
> supplying any heat, only pressure.
>
>

If that's true then there are different laminators.
I use Peach model's and Rex have same principle
 the heater heat parabolic curved alu extrusions and this is on one side 
of roller. That heat roller and in other side the laminated object is. 
The heather transfer area cover just little more than 1/2 of roller 
circumfanse.
The only hoot item near laminated object is roller itself.

If you are correct. ie board are preheated and after that just pressed 
by (cold) roller then slowdown should help. But I'm in doubt if the 
roller itself can handle raised temperature as cooper has good heat 
transfer compared with paper and plastic. I assume that in your 
laminator the rollers are just little heated by medium. In my laminator 
the roller itself heat medium.

That can be mystery solved why some laminator roller's are destroyed if 
heater is forced to aprox 200centigrade.

just different type of laminator heating principle. What is better is to 
be discovered.

Slavko.

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Speed control for laminator motor

2010-05-02 by Slavko Kocjancic

... and little more.
For now in small laminators I see just smal synchronous motor, and in 
one big one I see squirel cage shaded pole motor. As all of these are 
frequency dependent the regulation is not so easy. Pwm wil not work. 
These motors need sinevave signal of changing frequency. Even worse. If 
we lower frequency then we MUST lower the voltage too or we will burn 
that motor. When frequency is turned up the voltage is turned up too. - 
the power must stay same. In low frequency the indictance has less 
influence than pure resistance and in high frequency the inductance have 
more impact. But going high is not good idea for that's motors as they 
in most cases doesn't have good lamination and high frequency eddy 
current's will heat up the core.

The easy way to go trought that problems is to put on/off circuit and 
this should triger in zerro crossing or overheat will be here again. 
Let's just pass 50 periodes of AC and after that block 50 periodes and 
we have 50% slower transfer. The simple 555 and zero crossing 
photocoupler with triac can do that. Just don't go way below 50 cycles 
of on period.

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Speed control for laminator motor

2010-05-02 by Bob Huish

I am thinking of changing the circuit/code in Microchips app note AN958 
to slow the motor down/

Bob H
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On 5/1/2010 10:24 PM, Slavko Kocjancic wrote:
> ... and little more.
> For now in small laminators I see just smal synchronous motor, and in
> one big one I see squirel cage shaded pole motor. As all of these are
> frequency dependent the regulation is not so easy. Pwm wil not work.
> These motors need sinevave signal of changing frequency. Even worse. If
> we lower frequency then we MUST lower the voltage too or we will burn
> that motor. When frequency is turned up the voltage is turned up too. -
> the power must stay same. In low frequency the indictance has less
> influence than pure resistance and in high frequency the inductance have
> more impact. But going high is not good idea for that's motors as they
> in most cases doesn't have good lamination and high frequency eddy
> current's will heat up the core.
>
> The easy way to go trought that problems is to put on/off circuit and
> this should triger in zerro crossing or overheat will be here again.
> Let's just pass 50 periodes of AC and after that block 50 periodes and
> we have 50% slower transfer. The simple 555 and zero crossing
> photocoupler with triac can do that. Just don't go way below 50 cycles
> of on period.
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Speed control for laminator motor

2010-05-02 by Simao Cardoso

Slavko Kocjancic wrote:

> 
> If that's true then there are different laminators.
> I use Peach model's and Rex have same principle the heater heat
> parabolic curved alu extrusions and this is on one side 
> of roller. That heat roller and in other side the laminated object is.
> The heather transfer area cover just little more than 1/2 of roller 
> circumfanse. The only hoot item near laminated object is roller
> itself.
> 
> If you are correct. ie board are preheated and after that just pressed
> by (cold) roller then slowdown should help. But I'm in doubt if the 
> roller itself can handle raised temperature as cooper has good heat 
> transfer compared with paper and plastic. I assume that in your 
> laminator the rollers are just little heated by medium. In my
> laminator the roller itself heat medium.
> 
> That can be mystery solved why some laminator roller's are destroyed
> if heater is forced to aprox 200centigrade.

Slavko, you are absolutely correct. In expensive laminators the rubber
roller has the heater itself and they heat the board to the desired temp
in a single pass. Cheap laminators have rollers heated like 'oven
cooking' (rolls inside a chamber with heaters) and very low termal
transfer to a pcb, that's why people use multiple pass. I would say that
temp and speed control modifications of this laminators is kind of
useless or a way to damage the rubber roll but i don't want to insult
anyone. 

After use a 5 digits priced laminator every laminator i look for was
cheap crap or inaccessible expensive. I ended buying a GBC H400 A3
laminator with temp control by 80eur. They said it had 4 rollers which
convinced me to buy it. I expected the 'holy grail' but was a bad
choice, besides the ugly bad circuit inside, the 2 front rollers are
also 'toasted' to heat up. It still makes the best toner transfers i
ever done (after multiple pass) and it can handle thickness of 2mm
easily, but i want one with better rolls. I should search for print
shops scrap instead. 

I find the temp control useless, the sensor is below the aluminum frame
not on the roller surface. And i guess at least 1000W per roller is
necessary to heat the board while running, mine has 700W in total. The
motor in my laminator seems a AC Permanent-split capacitor motor, not
the easiest to speed control (btw, changing the capacitor value
works??). Running it slower can burn the exposed rubber on the roller, i
guess the manufactor defined the speed by the rubber termal specs,
changing it seems always bad. Worst in my case, i wish only the back
rollers attached to the motor and the front ones free, only a little
stuck to stretch a dryfilm sheet. But for good termal transfer and good
stretching there is Adam Seychell method.

Slavko, Peach laminator models does not have the rolls built in heater
or 4 rolls? Few time ago a fellow from Slovenia posted an hacked peach
laminator, i described another hack to improve dry film use but i
thought the aluminum profiles were his add not a 'toasting' heater. Only
the rolls with built in heater can heat without rolling, the 'toasted'
type must be rolling while heating or may burn.
(btw ebay item 140359297404 has a nice internal picture with visible
rolls, not inside 'toasting' chamber, but without visible electric
connections to the rolls).

Sim�o

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Speed control for laminator motor

2010-05-03 by Slavko Kocjancic

Simao Cardoso pravi:
>  
>
> Slavko Kocjancic wrote:
>
> >
> > If that's true then there are different laminators.
> > I use Peach model's and Rex have same principle the heater heat
> > parabolic curved alu extrusions and this is on one side
> > of roller. That heat roller and in other side the laminated object is.
> > The heather transfer area cover just little more than 1/2 of roller
> > circumfanse. The only hoot item near laminated object is roller
> > itself.
> >
> > If you are correct. ie board are preheated and after that just pressed
> > by (cold) roller then slowdown should help. But I'm in doubt if the
> > roller itself can handle raised temperature as cooper has good heat
> > transfer compared with paper and plastic. I assume that in your
> > laminator the rollers are just little heated by medium. In my
> > laminator the roller itself heat medium.
> >
> > That can be mystery solved why some laminator roller's are destroyed
> > if heater is forced to aprox 200centigrade.
>
> Slavko, you are absolutely correct. In expensive laminators the rubber
> roller has the heater itself and they heat the board to the desired temp
> in a single pass. Cheap laminators have rollers heated like 'oven
> cooking' (rolls inside a chamber with heaters) and very low termal
> transfer to a pcb, that's why people use multiple pass. I would say that
> temp and speed control modifications of this laminators is kind of
> useless or a way to damage the rubber roll but i don't want to insult
> anyone.
>
> After use a 5 digits priced laminator every laminator i look for was
> cheap crap or inaccessible expensive. I ended buying a GBC H400 A3
> laminator with temp control by 80eur. They said it had 4 rollers which
> convinced me to buy it. I expected the 'holy grail' but was a bad
> choice, besides the ugly bad circuit inside, the 2 front rollers are
> also 'toasted' to heat up. It still makes the best toner transfers i
> ever done (after multiple pass) and it can handle thickness of 2mm
> easily, but i want one with better rolls. I should search for print
> shops scrap instead.
>
> I find the temp control useless, the sensor is below the aluminum frame
> not on the roller surface. And i guess at least 1000W per roller is
> necessary to heat the board while running, mine has 700W in total. The
> motor in my laminator seems a AC Permanent-split capacitor motor, not
> the easiest to speed control (btw, changing the capacitor value
> works??). Running it slower can burn the exposed rubber on the roller, i
> guess the manufactor defined the speed by the rubber termal specs,
> changing it seems always bad. Worst in my case, i wish only the back
> rollers attached to the motor and the front ones free, only a little
> stuck to stretch a dryfilm sheet. But for good termal transfer and good
> stretching there is Adam Seychell method.
>
> Slavko, Peach laminator models does not have the rolls built in heater
> or 4 rolls? Few time ago a fellow from Slovenia posted an hacked peach
> laminator, i described another hack to improve dry film use but i
> thought the aluminum profiles were his add not a 'toasting' heater. Only
> the rolls with built in heater can heat without rolling, the 'toasted'
> type must be rolling while heating or may burn.
> (btw ebay item 140359297404 has a nice internal picture with visible
> rolls, not inside 'toasting' chamber, but without visible electric
> connections to the rolls).
>
> Sim�o
>
> __._,_.
There is a long forum thread at *http://tinyurl.com/3aypb4a
*It's in Slovenian language but here is a lot of pictures that talk 
universal language...
In our little country I think all home PCB makers read this and have 
success..

Slavko.
*
*

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.