cheap TRF foil experiment is a success
2016-12-26 by Rob
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:05 UTC
Thread
2016-12-26 by Rob
2016-12-26 by kbyrne10@...
2016-12-26 by soffee83@...
2016-12-26 by Harvey White
On 26 Dec 2016 09:07:53 -0800, you wrote: >Rob, > >Would you by chance have actual Pulsar TRF or anything on hand? It would be interesting to see how they compare. There are so many factors with this stuff it's hard to tell what's causing what sometimes. I've got the modded Apache, the eBay yellow transfer paper, and the real TRF, and I've still had bouts where the crap just wasn't working. My main issue is that I don't do transfers consistently enough to arrive at a solid setup. Seems like every time I set the stuff back up, I've forgotten what did or didn't work the last time I did it. I probably need to start jotting down notes. Every once and a while, the pulsar film almost completely malfunctions. I get large splotches that do not stick at all, and those that do, damage the toner. No idea, since the temperature on the laminator doesn't vary, and the next one might be just fine. Harvey > >Thanks!
2016-12-26 by soffee83@...
2016-12-26 by Harvey White
On 26 Dec 2016 09:22:52 -0800, you wrote: >Harvey, > >That's crazy, as it's exactly what I was talking about. I think about two sessions ago I had the TRF come out looking almost exactly like it does going in. It just lifted right off the board with almost no part sticking. I think I ended up moving to my old iron and not using the laminator. I'm still of the belief that something in there has to be different. Maybe the laminator lies about its current temp or something?? Actually, I don't think so, since I was doing a run and the ones before and after turned out ok. I'm beginning to suspect the foil itself may have a contaminant on it, or the toner, somehow. Putting fresh foil on the board and reworking the board generally will ruin something on the pattern. Harvey > >Take Care
2016-12-26 by soffee83@...
2016-12-26 by me@...
2016-12-26 by Rob
\ufffdOn 26 Dec 2016 09:22:52 -0800, you wrote:
>Harvey,
>
>That's crazy, as it's exactly what I was talking about. I think about two sessions ago I had the TRF come out looking almost exactly like it does going in. It just lifted right off the board with almost no part sticking. I think I ended up moving to my old iron and not using the laminator. I'm still of the belief that something in there has to be different. Maybe the laminator lies about its current temp or something??
Actually, I don't think so, since I was doing a run and the ones
before and after turned out ok.
I'm beginning to suspect the foil itself may have a contaminant on it,
or the toner, somehow.
Putting fresh foil on the board and reworking the board generally will
ruin something on the pattern.
Harvey
>
>Take Care
2016-12-26 by Rob
I use HP laserjet toner.... and the 10 cent EBAY yellow transfer paper and I heat up my heavy metal to 400 degrees and then wait for optimum 350 degrees as the temp falls over a 15 minute period....thermal mass being thermal mass and all that science.... slap artwork and copper on silicone mat ...cover with mat... and steel press.... and flip over the egg timer hourglass.... very consistent results every time. Seems my 600 grit copper scrub down makes a world of difference. http://www.learnmorsecode.com/laminator/hotcakes.html I will experiment in the future more with laminators..and rollers... after I get gears. http://www.learnmorsecode.com/laminator/index.html maybe. Seems heavy metal press.... 20 pounds of press weight....and one $12 digital thermometer....and a hot plate.... game over... I win. And no... I never bought Pulsar TRF foil. I've never played with this stuff before so my idea of fun was how much of this 100 foot stuff could be used for all sorts of crafty stuff with my grandchildren.... who I actually gave a PANTUM printer for Christmas just for crafts artwork.
On 12/26/2016 12:07 PM, soffee83@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote: > > Rob, > > Would you by chance have actual Pulsar TRF or anything on hand? It > would be interesting to see how they compare. There are so many > factors with this stuff it's hard to tell what's causing what > sometimes. I've got the modded Apache, the eBay yellow transfer paper, > and the real TRF, and I've still had bouts where the crap just wasn't > working. My main issue is that I don't do transfers consistently > enough to arrive at a solid setup. Seems like every time I set the > stuff back up, I've forgotten what did or didn't work the last time I > did it. I probably need to start jotting down notes. > > Thanks! > >
2016-12-26 by Rob
YES very wide. MACK TRUCK highway lanes wide. My vision is impaired. so bigger is better for me.... nothing I do is ever going to be used in anything real world for sale...state of the art being smaller is better.....SMT... etc... its just hobby stuff. BUT the experiment IS the same...laser print.... heat toner.. transfer to copper and etch. Noting that sometimes the toner transfered is not perfect...has very tiny pitting.... so thie idea here is to cover all traces with this next layer...green stuff... pigment.... and then have less pitting damage to copper traces. My solution to this pitting problem was to trace all toner with a SHARPIE or EDDING 404 permanent marker BUT and this is the real reason for using TRF WHEN IT GETS REAL SMALL I can't , you can't, expect to trace the real thin lines and pads without screwing up the artwork too much so TRY the green stuff and see if it cures the normal pitting. TWO heats doesn't seem to be a problem. I'm not mashing with rollers though. So I don't get that extrusion factor.
On 12/26/2016 02:13 PM, me@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote: > > Your traces are awfully wide. I would like to see experiments with > more narrow traces. > > This stuff looks interesting for transfers for things like silk layers > and labeling project boxes. > > But from my reading it looks like you now have 2 transfers to worry > about. One for the toner, one for the foil. What is the advantage here > other than some cool colors? > >
2016-12-26 by Harvey White
On 26 Dec 2016 11:13:09 -0800, you wrote: >Your traces are awfully wide. I would like to see experiments with more narrow traces. > >This stuff looks interesting for transfers for things like silk layers and labeling project boxes. > >But from my reading it looks like you now have 2 transfers to worry about. One for the toner, one for the foil. What is the advantage here other than some cool colors? The green foil is used to seal the toner for microscopic holes. It does work, and is a bit harder than just the toner, although it can be scratched. It won't rub off as easily as toner might. The same approach may be used after etching (and gluing the boards together if you do that). Print the silk screen layer on the paper you use (or directly print it on the board... if you do), then use the white TRF foil to simulate a silk screen. It (at least, the pulsar version), is thicker and comes off in pieces. I use masking tape (not aggressive) to pick up the remnants. The part bonded to the toner generally stays, the free floating parts don't. I have not yet tried color toner to make a multi-colored board, although that is a possibility. I've stopped doing silk screen layers, though. My board preparation is generally scrubbing with bon-ami (or an abrasive cleanser that has some metal brighteners in it), then roughing up with 1000 or 1200 grit paper. Force air dry it with a hair dryer (it may discolor, depending on your water, never had a problem), then an acetone rub with a lint free cloth. Toner transfer as usual. (I go from laminator to water directly, it seems to minimize cracking). When the board is still wet, dry it off with a hair dryer, it will be somewhat warm, which is ok. Then put on the green TRF. Allow that to cool completely. The parts of the TRF over the toner should transfer completely. Etch, tin plate if desired, drill pilot holes, epoxy the bottom to the top, allow to completely cure, drill holes, mount parts. Harvey
2016-12-26 by Harvey White
On 26 Dec 2016 11:02:05 -0800, you wrote: >That's possible too Harvey. I'll keep an eye out for it. I can't remember if I tried to reuse the stuff that didn't stick. Now that I think back, there were some hazy splotches, and I think it heated and smeared the toner, so I probably started over with all new stuff on the next successful pass. The foil that did not stick looked a bit more shiny than before, as if it had absorbed a layer of some sort of oil from the toner. Just guessing here. Toner was HP and new. No idea what the problem was, just that it happened. Harvey > >Take Care
2016-12-26 by soffee83@...