Hi Paul, You wrote: > Kamm, you're being a bit disingenuous here. What people were > reacting to, for the most part, was your rather snarky > contention that your opinion carried more weight by virtue of > your occupation as a programmer. Not true! I reread those posts and the majority reacted to my statement that it wasn't a dot 5 upgrade. I stated that I was a programmer only after receiving two posts insinuating that I couldn't know it wasn't a dot 5 upgrade from the information available (but apparently Orren *could* determine it was based on the same information I had). Kamm
Message
[Logic_Cafe] What you can't say on LUG
2005-04-13 by Kamm Schreiner