Apple Logic Pro /LogicExpress Discussion

Kamm Schreiner wrote:

> Hi Paul,
> 
> You wrote:
> 
>>Kamm, you're being a bit disingenuous here. What people were 
>>reacting to, for the most part, was your rather snarky 
>>contention that your opinion carried more weight by virtue of 
>>your occupation as a programmer.
> 
> 
> Not true! I reread those posts and the majority reacted to my statement that
> it wasn't a dot 5 upgrade. I stated that I was a programmer only after
> receiving two posts insinuating that I couldn't know it wasn't a dot 5
> upgrade from the information available (but apparently Orren *could*
> determine it was based on the same information I had).

For what it's worth (no more than 2 cents) I, like someone else who 
mentioned this idea recently, strongly suspect that Orren and others who 
reckon it's a .5 upgrade are beta testers.

I'm actually surprized how little this possibility was mentioned in the 
discussion. Maybe it *would* have been mentioned a lot more if the LUG 
wasn't moderated? ;-)