Hi Maurits, Judging from your replies, I guess your beef is with people with beefs? ;) Please don't be angry with me. I'm just trying to lighten it up a little. I'm sure you must realize that Yavuz had a legitimately bad experience. Personally I'm happy to let him vent a little. I know I would have been *very* upset had I been in his shoes. I have a suspicion that you would have been too. Hoping I'm not going to draw the wrath of Kahn upon myself, Kamm > -----Original Message----- > From: Logic_Cafe@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:Logic_Cafe@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Maurits van de Kamp > Sent: 04/20/2005 12:46 PM > To: Logic_Cafe@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [Logic_Cafe] Re: What you can't say on LUG > > > > I just tried to point Apple's and Emagic's wrong doing in a polite > > way, LUG moderator did not approve the message. > > What exactly did you write? Anything we haven't heared a > thousand times before? And not filled with wild ideas about > what Apple "probably" does and "probably" thinks of us? Just > curious. :o) > > > I am glad this is a more democratic forum. > > It's just unmoderated, that's all. > > > There was a time in New York when a homeless guy was > arrested because > > he cursed at a Police Officer. > > The judge let him go and pointed out that he was happy that the > > homeless was exercising his right of freedom of speech. > > I find freedom of speech is too often used as an excuse for > verbal abuse. > Besides, that has nothing to do with moderating a forum (that > clearly states from the start that it's moderated). > > > I understand the forums should stay on topic. > > And the topic is "Apple's wrongdoing"? Maybe people > subscribing to the list for actual help and advice from > fellow users get tired of that subject by now? In case you > hadn't noticed already, "Apple's wrong doing" has been > pointed out over and over and over and over again (actually, > the moderators apparantly let it through!) and there's no one > reading the list that can do anything about it. You want to > complain, complain to Apple. > > > However, this is directly on the subject and related to Apple and > > Emagic. > > But, did it contain any useful information? > > > Too bad. > > They could only make their software or support better if > they listened > > to their customers > > Hre we go again.. LUG is NOT APPLE!!!!!! > > > instead of pointing fingers at each other (Apple and Emagic). > > Emagic doesn't exist anymore and the team IS now Apple, > there's no one to point a finger at. > > Sorry, I agree the moderators are sometimes out of line, but > I'm getting SO SICK of this opressed-peasant-stuff and the > wanking about we're-so-damn-good-with-our-democratic forums. > And to think someone called LUG selfrighteous. > > There, you wanted freedom of speech? Here it is. > > Maurits. > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > --------------------~--> What would our lives be like without > music, dance, and theater? > Donate or volunteer in the arts today at Network for Good! > http://us.click.yahoo.com/rKxVKC/SOnJAA/n1hLAA/JPJolB/TM > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ------~-> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > >
Message
RE: [Logic_Cafe] Re: What you can't say on LUG
2005-04-20 by Kamm Schreiner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.