Apple Logic Pro /LogicExpress Discussion

On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, YAVUZ AKYAZICI wrote:

> > Hre we go again.. LUG is NOT APPLE!!!!!!
> 
> I can not believe you are so ignorant.
> I have ben following LUG since version 2.5.
> I know what is what.
> People used to say "This is not the bug-report forum." at Emagic times.
> However, it did help for a lot of bug fixes.

That doesn't mean it's Apple. Or Emagic.  All it means is we got lucky 
that someone form that comapny took an interest in an independent group.

> That is what the list is about as well as answering questions. You
> either help someone who does not know how to do a certain thing or...
> You can point out weak points of the software (support is one of them)
> so people can make it better.
>
Maybe, but that doesn't mean that the list is affiliated with Apple.  The
reasoning is a little flawed there.  (If it were a real apple list, then
they could do a helluva lot better job of moderating it to protect their
own interests.)  It's veyr nice that people like Markus read the list and 
take it as feedback, but they're under no obligation to do so nor is the 
company.  It may be in their interests from time to time to read it, but 
frankly it's a lot of resources consumed to monitor it and they do have an 
official bug-tracking form which I'm guessing takes precendent over a 
bunch of people speculating about what Soundtrack Pro's plugins will do.

(also, technically, we have no freedom of speech here either.  SInce this 
is a yahoo list we're bound by the conditions of the user agreement and if 
they decided hey, you can't say the word "semprini" on the list, then we'd 
have no real recourse).

_______________________________________________________
Eric Oehler / wonko@... / www.nulldevice.com
Synthetic music for synthetic people.