On Thursday, May 5, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Kamm Schreiner wrote: >> When you say you gave it a serious try, what did this entail? > > I did the same as I did with Logic and Cubase. I decided I was going to > rough it through the remaking of one of my old songs (written back in > the > late 70's). What I found was that - to my amazement - DP does not have > the > equivalent of Regions for MIDI - only for Audio. Both Sonar and Cubase > do, > but all you get with DP is a computer generated (cannot be modified by > the > user) grouping of midi notes that it "thinks" are related. It is only > available in the Tracks view and there is very little you can do with > them. > > For instance, I was using an external sound module and decided I > wanted to > use EWQLSO instead. Creating the soft synth track was painless, (much > easier > than Logic), but you can't copy the midi events from a midi track to a > soft > synth track because DP will only allow you to copy events among > identical > track types. This is not true- I do this all the time. It's extremely easy as a matter of fact, as easy as Logic (which I also use and love) > So I was going to have to replay and re-edit the entire track? > I don't think so... ;) Oh yea, and the tracks view is *tiny* and I > could > find no way to zoom the size of the a track vertically. This is also easy- did you read the manual? > > In addition, although DP has a rather complete set of midi editing > features, > they are cumbersome compared to Logic. Example: > > To change all selected note lengths to be equal in Logic, just hold > down > Ctrl+Option while dragging. You have to open a dialog in DP and set > the note > length and then click OK. There is an equivalent key command as well in DP. > Selecting midi notes is different too. In Logic, > if a rubberband selection touches a note it will be selected, I found this method to be a pain too- notes that I don't want to select get selected- took me a while to get used to this... > in DP you must > encompass the entire note for it to be selected. > Or wait, I think that it is > that you must select the "start" of the note. At any rate, it is pain. > > DP has an info line in the titlebar of the midi editor window, but if > you > drag a value up or down with the mouse to increase or decrease it, it > gets > focus (becomes selected) and you must press enter or click on another > control to finish the action. If you select more than one note, the > info > line disappears. If I could have edited the info line with multiple > notes > selected (i.e. to change the length of all selected notes it would > have been > very useful, but no. > > Want to create legato with DP? It's a real pain. Just Shift+Tab in > Logic. Logic is excellent for this. > > I really hate DP's method of drawing/editing automation too. It is just > clunky compared to Logic. Which by-the-way is simply untouchable by any > other DAW I've used. I happen to think drawing automation is much more superior in DP, but that's me personally. The ability to make smooth, scalable Bezier curves is incredible. > > Finally, DP insists on defaulting to zoom sizes that are far too small > for > my personal taste. If I change the settings in the arrange window for > the > size of notes, the next time I open the song, they've reverted back to > the > default size. You can use the Mac OS stationary feature or make a template to get around this. > > Anyway, you get the picture. The lack of the equivalent of a region > for midi > events was a show stopper right away, but I still kept going trying to > convince myself there must be some other redeeming feature that would > take > its place. There wasn't. i find NOT having regions to be a plus, I like using regions in Logic when I'm doing dance oriented stuff, but for genres that are looser, DP has this more open and free way of composing. > > I wish that Logic had the equivalent of the consolidated window in DP, > but > I'll put up with Logic's separate Windows any day to have its power and > flexibility. > > I will say this though, DPs manual and index are light years better > than > Logic's. I find both manuals are comprehensive enough for me, I wish DP had it in 'pdf' format too. > > Have you tried DP? If so, what was your take on it compared to Logic? see above ; ) > > Kamm > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
Message
Re: [Logic_Cafe] An inauspicious beginning
2005-05-05 by Eddie Sullivan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.