On 09/03/2007, at 4:51 AM, Chris Coccia wrote: > As I replied on the Logic Users Group as well once again this is > not true. > It was in fact AutoTune that was used on Cher's voice. Has anyone ever tried to do the Cher effect with -just- an autotune type plugin? If you had you'll notice that it will give you the timbre but not the smooth pitch control. Any voice performance will have autotune jumping all over the place with way unacceptable pitch artifacts. I've seen the SOS update to the interview (thanks for pointing that out) and I reckon this is still not the full story. They lied once... Based on my own experiments it's either not autotune at all or it's autotune in conjunction with a vocoder. > The producers did > not want anyone knowing what they used so they decided to blame it on > the Digitech Vocalist that had just come out. The article is up at > Sound on Sound.com for all to go verify so we never > have to hear about old horseface Cher again hehehe. :) Just because it's up at SOS doesn't make it 100% true. In fact the - original- interview has errors, which were then "apparently" corrected. And don't think I'm bashing SOS because I'm a subscriber and think it's one of the better of it's kind out there... Also just to keep the record straight it was a Digitech Talker mentioned in the article not the Vocalist. Kind regards ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Paul Najar Jaminajar Music Production www.jaminajar.com major site overhaul feb 2007 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Logic_Cafe] Re: [LUG] Recommendations for a Vocoder / Man Parrish
2007-03-09 by Paul Najar
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.