seems easy enough to check. set up a keyboard sequencer to play the
same thing through the same preamps and converters then record in PT
and Logic. Bounce down. then take the audio recorded in each one, and
move it to the opposite program and bounce down. then put all four
audio files in our file area - and we have a poll to see how many
people think each one sounds the best. I guess it would need to be a
carefully chosen patch - maybe an acoustic guitar where you can hear
the attack and sustain of the notes.
-----Original Message-----
From: F Stuart Leeds <skip@...>
To: Logic_Cafe@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:18 pm
Subject: Re: [Logic_Cafe] Pro Tools for this, Logic for that??
I have seen this thread come up so many times over the
years. I
remember in the PC days, when it was Logic vs. Sonar, and Logic vs.
Cubase. Usually Logic was the one to beat, in those discussions.
When I converted over to Samplitude after the Apple debacle, I
started to harbor little fears that the audio I was recording wasn't
as good as what I was getting with Logic...using all the same high-
quality mics, pres, hardware, etc. Then I came to realize that the
main thing that had changed was my *workflow*. I was more comfortable
with Logic, and I felt stilted in Samp. That affected my
performances, and my mixes, and the whole process, really.
I think that's the difference people are hearing -- if indeed there
is a difference to be heard. I've heard stunning stuff out of almost
every major platform...and crap out of every major platform, as well.
For myself -- I'm 100% sure I can make a better-sounding mix in Logic
than in Pro Tools? How do I know that? Because I don't know squat
about ProTools! :)
Skip
On Jul 24, 2007, at 2:49 PM, GAmoore@... wrote:
>
> > I hate to say it, but I think that audio recorded into Pro Tools
> > might sound a little better than when I record to Logic, but I'm
> curious if
> > anybody else has
> > this suspicion/opinion.
> >
>
> Actually people have been saying this for years. There have been
> various
> debates on the LUG even 6-7 years ago. Some people say Nuendo
> sounds better too.
> Maybe there is some difference in the way audio is converted or
> blended on
> these systems. But then there will be some blind test, and there's
> really no
> difference. So its hard to say. I also liked the fact you could
> have different
> takes on the same track in protools, and it just seemed easier to
> deal with audio,
> but it totally sucked for midi, and there were only two screensets,
> and you
> couldn't use VST plugs at the time. So I gave it up, and just stick
> to Logic.
> I find it less headache to know one program well. I also have Live and
> Melodyne, but I just use them on the side at times for audio editing.
>
> If you want to talk about headaches.. how about dealing with Waves
> plugs. I
> just don't know what is with that company.
>
> **************************************
> Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at
> http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free
from AOL at AOL.com.Message
Re: [Logic_Cafe] Pro Tools for this, Logic for that??
2007-07-24 by GAmoore@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.