Hi, On 5-Jan-05, at 7:12 AM, Kamm Schreiner wrote: > The point is, *all* speakers (and I do mean ALL) color the sound. > There is > no such thing as a speaker with zero distortion and a perfectly flat > 1 to > 100,000 Hz frequency response. Even where you place your speakers > makes a > difference. What speaker sounds best is subjective. Yes, that is true. However, with all other things being equal, some speakers color the sound *more* than others. That is a big reason why you have nearfields that cost only a few hundred dollars and other nearfields that cost several thousand. A speaker that is more accurate (less coloring) and has a smoother transition through the crossover frequency (most nearfields employ a 2-way system) will allow you to hear more of what is really going on and provide a more accurate stereo image. All Dennis is saying is that by using a better speaker, it is easier for him to get a better mix and the final result that he is looking for. For some people, they don't see the point or they can't justify the extra expense. To each their own. To a certain extent, what speaker sounds best *is* subjective. However, there are more than subtle differences when you're comparing something like an NS10 to the Dynaudios or my A.D.A.M. S2A's. I spent a ton of time choosing which speakers would work best for me in my room a couple of years ago. I tried everything from the lower end such as the NS10's, Alesis, etc. to Mackie, Blue Sky, A.D.A.M., Dynaudio, Genelec. At one time I had about 5 different brands of monitor covering a large range in terms of price. The differences were quite apparent to most people. Yes, it was still subjective, but the bottom line and common theme between everyone's preferences was that you do get what you pay for. Not any one speaker pleased everyone. In some cases, some people preferred the low end of one and the high end of another. The old cliche of "you've got to know your speakers" is only a partial truth IMHO. This is a saying, IMHO, that makes people feel better about themselves when they've chosen to use lower-end speakers instead of investing in more expensive (and more accurate) monitors. IMHO, if you can't hear it, how can you possibly compensate for it. You may know about it and you may boost/cut at a particular frequency to compensate for your speaker, but you'll always be guessing. *KNOWING* is much better and I think that that is what Dennis is getting at. Just MHO, Fernstudio
Message
Re: [Logic_Cafe] The 80's (was Re: Lawsuits (was M-Audio 88Pro))
2005-01-05 by Fernstudio
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.