> Comedians get paid for live shows, tv appearances, > and DVD's. If someone > copied thier jokes to text and emailed it, its > equivalent to someone ripping an > MP3 and forwarding it. No, it's not. Copying someone's joke into text and emailing it is the equivalent to a garage band learning to play your song and then performing it for someone else. There is a huge difference. I might pay to see Prince performing Musicology (I did, in fact), but I have no interest in hearing 'Prance' cover the tune. If it such covers cost prince anything at all, it is a tiny amount compared to what file 'sharing' costs him, particularly when he is producing and distributing the album himself, taking 80% instead of 5%. You are right, it is a changing business world, and folks need to embrace technology, but they DON'T have to give up all their work for free, particularly when talking about something as simple and easily enforced as copyright on works being used by other artists. iTMS and others have restored a business model that works, but stopping the trade in illegal music should remain a priority, whether through DRM or some other mechanism. That said, I think maintaining some level of fair use availability for future purchases is important. If I can't listen to a purchase at home, on every stereo in the house, at work, and on my mp3 player(s), I have no interest in buying it. --sam __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
Message
Re: [Logic_Cafe] Re: Lawsuits (was M-Audio 88Pro
2005-01-05 by Samuel Gendler
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.