--- Nick Batzdorf <recording@...> wrote: > I should rephrase my important question: Will our software be adapted > to take advantage of 64-bit memory addressing? > The bells and whistles - and the fact that I don't remember any of > the upcoming features means that they must be bells and whistles > rather than must-haves - don't have me waiting with bated breath. > Being able to load an entire orchestral template on one machine does. Looking at the developer docs, I'd say no, at least not initially. While the Tiger core is 64 bit aware, many of the apple-provided libraries intended for use by developers are not yet 64 bit, meaning that any app which uses them also must remain 32 bit. Most notable are the interface libraries. Basically, any 64 bit application with a gui must either include a completely custom gui with no quartz or cocoa components, or else they must break their gui into a separate application and then communicate gui inputs to another, headless, 64-bit application via some form of interprocess communication. Much of the logic gui does appear to be totally custom, but dialogs and preference panes and such look to be cocoa. Short of rebuilding all of those components, or breaking them out into separate apps, logic is going to stay 32 bit until apple gets their act together and rebuilds all their libraries for Tiger. The only apps that will take adavantage of 64 bit addressing initially will be 'server' apps which run entirely in the background and communicate with a user via config files and such. It will be useful for 3d renderers, data visualization, databases, things of that nature. Once apple finishes the 64 bit transition (hopefully in a tiger point release, not OS XI), everything else will be able to take advantage. --sam __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
Message
Re: [Logic_Cafe] Re: Re: Re: Apple tiger release date...
2005-01-09 by Samuel Gendler
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.