I think we all have are different reasons why we think one DAW is better than the other. To me it should be based on the type of recording that you are planning to use the software for and your knowledge of what the software can do. I personally chose Logic because it fit my needs and I felt I understood Logic better than PT. I agree there are changes on both softwares that could make it more effecient for the user but it's up to Apple and Digi to decide on what and how they want to please their users. This might be out of line to say but this is a Logic Group so we are going to be more bias to Logic. I'm not trying to insult anyone.
________________________________
From: "GAmoore@..." <GAmoore@...>
To: Logic_Cafe@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 10:07:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Logic_Cafe] Re: Quick question
I wouldn't assume Logic has been abandoned. Some day there will suddenly be
an announcement of an update without any warning.
Despite PT's improvements, I really doubt that PT has midi capabilities
anywhere equal to Logic which are pretty well developed and used by hundreds of
thousands of people daily. Does PT even have a matrix window or event list tied
into score window automatically, or have that velocity editing view, or %
quantizations, or the transform window? I am sure PT has added a lot, just as Logic
has continued to add a lot in the audio and plugin areas, but that doesn't
make PT superior. In fact, I think Logic is more or less the standard when it
comes to music creation DAW's worldwide.
************ **
A Good Credit Score is 700
or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
(http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100126575x121882 2736x1201267884/ aol?redir= http:%2F% 2Fwww.freecredit report.com% 2Fpm%
2Fdefault.aspx% 3Fsc%3D668072% 26hmpgID% 3D62%26bcd% 3Dfebemailfooter NO62)
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Logic_Cafe] Re: Quick question
2009-02-27 by Stephen Klugh
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.