> Its hard to start a new group. We have done really well > having gotten 230 members in 6 weeks, but I think we need a > larger group of active members to get more substantive > discussions. I think you'll see on all lists that there are > ebbs and flows of good and bad discussions. Yes. And to me, "café'" says a little about this group to me. (I'm not trying to put words in Gregory's mouth - these are my feelings about the group.) There are going to be arguments - er uh - discussions in a café, but at the end of the evening people go home friends. Although I've certainly bantered with a few members on this list, I never meant anything personal. I just argue my point of view. Sometimes *very* rigorously. ;) Anyway, I hope you'll reconsider Howard. I've never taken offense by anything anyone has said to me on this list and I hope no one has taken offense from what I've said. I don't think that is anyone's intension. > When it comes to this list, I don't want to scold people or > act like a dictator. But I get it on both ends. Some people > complain and threaten to leave because of nonsense > discussions, and other complain and threaten to leave when > they are politely and privately told to tone it down. There > is no way to please everyone. It is frequently a thankless job. I do appreciate you myself though! Kamm
Message
RE: [Logic_Cafe] moderate/not (was The Good and the Bad)
2005-01-25 by Kamm Schreiner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.